4
4
0
Perspective from those elite few who have been to both the Jumpmaster and Pathfinder Courses, honestly which did you find required more focus? More difficult?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 26
Posted >1 y ago
As one who not only passed both courses, but later taught them, I feel they are equally tough. Pathfinder harder academic wise, jumpmaster harder physically (the sequence, being the biggest part of course).
(15)
Comment
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
Jumpmaster was more difficult for me...I thought Pathfinder was a breeze but I'm pretty good at math so I didn't stress like some of the others when it came to those types of written tests. Both fun schools though...
(12)
Comment
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
CARP was the hardest for me. It wasn't that the math was hard is was memorizing the charts.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
I don't buy it anytime somebody says it was a breeze. I think you're full of it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
I wouldn't say it was a breeze but I studied relatively hard and passed, don't have to memorize the carp charts anymore which was good
(0)
Reply
(0)
Suspended Profile
Posted >1 y ago
I'd do Jumpmaster first. Get an introduction to CARP. Besides, being a JM is a huge responsibility that I believe you would excel at. Then onto Pathfinder. The graduate course of both JM and Air Assault.
Read This Next