http:// https://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/Documents/3120_32C_CHANGE_7.pdf
I am researching the Navy SORM and asking if any other Navy Guys experienced the Navy the same way.

Seemingly my Navy Experience is not even considered in the SORM that only comprehends an Active Duty sailor assigned to a ship, for 1) indoctrination 2) training. And if you can not get the standard of indoctrination and training then what about benefits security protection leadership monitoring?

814 Indoctrination Training "The “welcome aboard” needs to be effective and ongoing."

"807. Shipboard Methods of Training" that happens Officers and senior petty officers, in their daily association with subordinates, must encourage professional development. ". and a “welcome aboard” needs to be effective and ongoing.


From: Chief of Naval Operations

Subj: STANDARD ORGANIZATION REGULATIONS OF THE U.S.NAVY




Chapter 8 Training

807. Shipboard Methods of Training. There are a variety of methods to chose from in conducting shipboard training. The selection should be based upon the method which best meets training objectives. The use of standard lesson plans is encouraged for formal, structured training.

On-The-Job-Training. Officers and senior petty officers, in their daily association with subordinates, must encourage professional development. OJT is a personalized means of teaching and developing professional skills. All OJT must be high quality, correct, and monitored. OJT results can be measured quickly, effectively, and informally.
Team Training. Team training in watch/battle station assignments is best accomplished through drills and exercises import and underway.

814 Indoctrination Training The performance of officer and enlisted personnel can be enhanced by command indoctrination programs for newly reporting personnel. These programs must clearly state command policy and, at the same time, inform the individual that he is an important part of the command. The “welcome aboard” needs to be effective and ongoing.


There is no SORM to even consider part time assignment as crew of a full time ship

Basically you experience everything part time for the next 5 years assigned to the ship. The difference between me and the other older reserve guys on the ship, was that I never had active duty time, freshly graduated bootcamp, with a reserve enlistment that recruited me the option to go college with the goal of becoming a officer, and all the reserve guys were senior enlisted prior active Not to mention the real crew was all active duty. The Navy SORM manual states OJT is “daily”. How can you get that if you are put on the ship sporadically? What will the full time crew think? Regardless I think it explains how my civilian life really was something. The pay for part time assignment is below poverty to feed yourself and house yourself off the ship with no medical insurance for simple things like anxiety stress reaction mentally or physically. That’ s a lot of pressure to put on a 18 yo guy assigned to a 200 Million Dollar FFG. Lastly that enlistment would be laughed at at the VA denied even a homeless housing voucher as over those 8 years they said I did not attain enough active duty days. Regardless I just look for another Navy Guy with a similar history. The Navy, is built on Standards. What happens when you break from that?


In my study the Navy IG infact investiaged the same ships I was assigned and stated twice in subsequent instructions “systemic weaknesses in the training and administration of SELRES personnel assigned to NRF ships”

<<1995 and 1998 Navy IG is reporting “systemic weakness in the training and administration of SELRES Personnel assigned to NRF Ships >>



https://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/3715654/FID863/SURFACE/50401.PDF


1995 5040.1

1. Purpose. To issue policy, provide guidance, and assign responsibility for RATE of Selected Reserve (SELRES)components in the Naval Reserve Force (NRF) ships.




3. Background The RATE program was initiated in response to a Navy Inspector General report documenting systemic weaknesses in the training and administration of SELRES personnel assigned to NRF ships. Historically, NRF ships and their SELRES components fell outside the cognizance of normal Reserve Readiness Inspectionsand, as a result, did not receive periodic formal oversight of the administration and training of the SELRES component.



(( Report 11a)

1998 5040.1A

Subject: Reserve Administration and Training Evaluation (RATE) Program
4. Background
The Rate Program was initiated in response to Navy Inspector General report documenting systemic weakness in the training and administration of SELRES Personnel assigned to NRF Ships
SELRES Personnel assigned must be ready to mobilize on short notice and, as a result, be maintained at the highest state of readiness.”