Avatar feed
Responses: 15
Col Joseph Lenertz
10
10
0
I call BS on the title. The title misleads by saying "sees combat" while the definition in the video seems to be "trigger pullers", but then it never cites a source even for that. When I'm refueling an F-16 over Iraq during OIF, and I can see the white, yellow, blue flashes of AAA and other ground fire, I clearly SEE combat. And I'm at risk from AA 105MM or larger, or if they launch a SAM I'm dead (no RWR gear, no chaff, no flare on a tanker). But, no trigger, so no combat? BS. Everyone in theater is in combat...everyone in uniform is a target, and is at risk today.
(10)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ James Woods
5
5
0
Well this video can be taken several ways but the point I see from it is how American cultural glorifies the military as mostly warriors making the hard sacrifices for our freedoms. Ok that's a fair viewpoint for commercialism and politics, but anyone who served knows the difference between war movies and real life. Yes the number of personnel with a combat MOS dwindles to the total military population. Yes no studio in Hollywood is going to make an action movie based on mechanics, doctors, and the logistician. Even Saving Private Ryan painted the HQ staff personnel at Normandy in a negative light as they had coffee and donuts in the CP amongst the carnage after the beaches were captured. But truth today, all our Servicemen regardless of MOS face potential combat situations in an asymmetrical environment but media will paint the combat troops as heroes and politicians will call all of us heroes to justify their voting for conflicts and war. I don't think general population could careless either way unless it's one of their family members.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
MASH was fairly successful, I can't help but wonder if the same thing could be done with a Signal or Logistics unit.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Joseph K Murdock
CPT Joseph K Murdock
>1 y
It depends on the size of the war. The bigger it is, the more combat arms.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
CPT Joseph K Murdock - That's not exactly accurate today. Conventional warfare of mid-20th century, yes; but today's vast technological battlefield, our logistical footprint in an operational theater of war is massive. CS and CSS troops still outnumber combat troops in theater.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Program Control Manager
5
5
0
Edited >1 y ago
I'm not sure I agree with the 10% figure, they may not be out there punching holes in enemy tanks or knocking down doors... however they are out there making sure the tip of the spear has plenty of access to things like fuel, ammo, water, food... has the ability to communicate, has an understanding of where the enemy is located and what the enemy is likely to do next, is prepared to fix or replace broken stuff... they are the rest of the spear.

It's nice to be able to bring a spear to a knife fight.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG(P) Chris Erickson - At the same time the other 90-95% are valid military targets. They still get shot at, they get hit with IEDs, and occasionally they shoot back.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close