Posted on Mar 23, 2022
4-year-old girl abandoned by smugglers found alone by Texas river
3.38K
67
34
9
9
0
What kind of parent abandons their child? Why would we want that kind of person in our country? What kind of monstrous administration encourages, aids and abetts entrance of illegal aliens and other criminals?
4-year-old girl abandoned by smugglers found alone by Texas river
Posted from nypost.com
Government
Children
Law
Immigration
Joe Biden
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
Trump worked very hard to end this kind of thing, Biden stopped it all and put Harris in charge, so here we are.
(3)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SFC (Join to see) - well we do know Obama administration gave kids to human traffickers. This is nothing new under Biden . Trump did work hard and was succeeding at the border.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SFC (Join to see) - if you are really worried about kids why aren’t you concerned about this? https://nypost.com/2021/09/01/feds-lose-track-of-thousands-of-migrant-kids-after-release-report/
Feds reportedly lose track of thousands of migrant kids after release
The Biden administration has lost contact with thousands of unaccompanied illegal immigrant children who have been released from federal custody, according to a report.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SFC (Join to see) - things are worse under Biden than Trump. But because it only embarrasses Biden it is ignored. Human smugglers actually coordinate where they are dropping kids when the smugglers decide to care at all. Kids are drowning try to cross the zero Grand river. Again, it is rarely mentioned because it embarrasses Biden. https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2021-08-06/one-day-total-of-child-migrants-crossing-border-hits-reported-high-under-biden
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
SFC (Join to see) - I am sure Harris is on top of this! https://www.newsweek.com/650-die-border-first-year-biden-24-percent-more-peak-under-trump-obama-1658242 Just so much better under Biden correct?
650 die at border in first year of Biden, 24 percent more than peak under Trump, Obama
This new peak in border crosser deaths come as migration across the Southwest border has experienced record highs.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
The child was not with parents. The child was caught within the human trafficking pipeline that Biden is allowing to operate without impunity
(2)
(0)
Maj John Bell
Those who will not secure the border, who will not stop offering enticements, who will not ruthlessly enforce our immigration laws, who will not depart with all due haste are complicit in what happens to all the Julia's and to all those who die, are abused or enslaved in the attempt to illegally immigrate.
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SrA John Monette - Exactly, the wall was never going to be completed (as long as the Democrats could put a stop to it). And a wall on its own never stopped anything. It should be a small part of a comprehensive program that
1) No longer incentivizes illegal entry, and in fact, punishes repeat offenses.
2) Removes the possibility of citizenship, lawful residence, or legal entry permanently
3) Punishes, criminally and civilly, those who knowingly aid, abet, or faciltate illegal immigrants and unlawful residents.
It was very easy to have Mexico "pay" for the wall. On average we give Mexico just under $350million in aid. For every dollar we have to put into deportation, take three from the foreign aid we give them and spend it on the wall. That both builds the wall and increases enforcement on the southern side.
What is the cause and effect of illegal immigration on re-districting? That leap is too long for me to follow.
My phrase "cut from the herd" must have gone by you. It is not implying that they want to reduce the Latino vote. It is implying that they want to secure the Latino vote for the Democratic party for themselves by using border security, illegal immigration, and deportation as wedge issues.
As far as your question about "ruthless enforcement," are you being deliberately obtuse? I'll try to make it plainer and simpler for you. Shooting and beating illegal immigrants would be illegal. Imprisonment on bread and water would be cruel and unusual punishment. As of 2019, the US Navy (the last holdout) no longer practices it.
By ruthless enforcement I mean no "catch and release." If you are in the country illegally you are detained until your status as an asylum seeker is approved. If it is disapproved you are subject to an immediate deportation hearing (run them 24/7) and if so decided, you are deported immediately. The only federal benefits that would be provided at taxpayer expense would be adequate food, shelter, water, and medical treatment necessary for life stabilization and safe deportation transit.
Go back to ICE raids on employers if ICE receives credible evidence that an employer is hiring illegal aliens or unlawful residents. Impose the existing criminal and civil penalties against both the employer and it officers who employ illegal aliens without due diligence in their hiring practices. Stop the nonsense that employers and landlords are no longer able to ask an applicant if they are in the US legally and have permission to work. Do not issue illegal aliens ID for purposes of conducting business (banking, driving, purchase of alcohol, tobacco, medical prescriptions, employment under federal, state and municipal contracts, and driving).
1) No longer incentivizes illegal entry, and in fact, punishes repeat offenses.
2) Removes the possibility of citizenship, lawful residence, or legal entry permanently
3) Punishes, criminally and civilly, those who knowingly aid, abet, or faciltate illegal immigrants and unlawful residents.
It was very easy to have Mexico "pay" for the wall. On average we give Mexico just under $350million in aid. For every dollar we have to put into deportation, take three from the foreign aid we give them and spend it on the wall. That both builds the wall and increases enforcement on the southern side.
What is the cause and effect of illegal immigration on re-districting? That leap is too long for me to follow.
My phrase "cut from the herd" must have gone by you. It is not implying that they want to reduce the Latino vote. It is implying that they want to secure the Latino vote for the Democratic party for themselves by using border security, illegal immigration, and deportation as wedge issues.
As far as your question about "ruthless enforcement," are you being deliberately obtuse? I'll try to make it plainer and simpler for you. Shooting and beating illegal immigrants would be illegal. Imprisonment on bread and water would be cruel and unusual punishment. As of 2019, the US Navy (the last holdout) no longer practices it.
By ruthless enforcement I mean no "catch and release." If you are in the country illegally you are detained until your status as an asylum seeker is approved. If it is disapproved you are subject to an immediate deportation hearing (run them 24/7) and if so decided, you are deported immediately. The only federal benefits that would be provided at taxpayer expense would be adequate food, shelter, water, and medical treatment necessary for life stabilization and safe deportation transit.
Go back to ICE raids on employers if ICE receives credible evidence that an employer is hiring illegal aliens or unlawful residents. Impose the existing criminal and civil penalties against both the employer and it officers who employ illegal aliens without due diligence in their hiring practices. Stop the nonsense that employers and landlords are no longer able to ask an applicant if they are in the US legally and have permission to work. Do not issue illegal aliens ID for purposes of conducting business (banking, driving, purchase of alcohol, tobacco, medical prescriptions, employment under federal, state and municipal contracts, and driving).
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SrA John Monette - Somehow this was cut from my last response.
This will be a gargantuan task at first. The Biden administration has encouraged illegal immigration. Once people realize that we are serious about our border security and that the likelihood of a happy outcome is nil, they will stay fix their own country or try someplace else.
This will be a gargantuan task at first. The Biden administration has encouraged illegal immigration. Once people realize that we are serious about our border security and that the likelihood of a happy outcome is nil, they will stay fix their own country or try someplace else.
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SrA John Monette - If you don't include my name, I won't know you asked a question unless I see it by chance.
With some exceptions, the Immigration and Welfare Reform Act of 1996 Act prohibits not-qualified (illegal) immigrants from enrolling in most “federal public benefit programs” paid for by federal funds. But the law’s definition does not specify which programs are covered by the term, leaving that clarification to each federal benefit–granting agency. Any new programs must be designated as "federal public benefits" in order to trigger the associated eligibility restrictions and, until they are designated as such, they remain open to broader groups of immigrants including illegal aliens paroled into the United States for more than one year or having illegally remained in the U.S. in excess of 5 years without government permission.
The Department of Homeland Security announced on March 9, 2021, that they will no longer defend the public charge rule. This removes the requirement to prove citizenship legal entry and/or lawful residence for all or some benefits under the following programs. Technically most of these programs cannot give benefits to illegal aliens or unlawful residents, but the agencies are barred from determining legal residence or unlawful residence. The illegal lien must self-disclose, or a third party must come forward with credible evidence. In addition, illegal aliens may apply for exemption status if they are awaiting a deportation hearing, can offer proof of residence for a period of five or more years in the U.S. or are certain survivors of human trafficking.
This list is not all inclusive.
_ SNAP, SSNAP (not the same as SNAP) and WIC benefits
_Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
_Summer Food Service program
_Special Milk program
_Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP)
_The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
_Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR)
_ Headstart
_Low Cost Healthcare insurance under the ACA (They cannot receive government assistance in paying, but they can participate in the government insurance pools)
_TANF benefits (Temporary Assistance for needy Families)
_Lifeline (federal program that provides low-cost cell phones to qualifying applicants)
_Free healthcare, if qualified under:
+Hill-Burton act
+National Patient Travel Center programs
+Office of Minority Health programs
+U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - USDA funded Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).
_CHIP
_National Council on AGING benefits
_HUD Benefits
+rent and mortgage and foreclosure assistance programs
+Housing choice voucher programs
+Low Income Heating and Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
In addition, some state and non-governmental Organization (NGO) programs that receive federal grants or subsidies do not require proof of citizenship, legal entry or lawful residence.
With some exceptions, the Immigration and Welfare Reform Act of 1996 Act prohibits not-qualified (illegal) immigrants from enrolling in most “federal public benefit programs” paid for by federal funds. But the law’s definition does not specify which programs are covered by the term, leaving that clarification to each federal benefit–granting agency. Any new programs must be designated as "federal public benefits" in order to trigger the associated eligibility restrictions and, until they are designated as such, they remain open to broader groups of immigrants including illegal aliens paroled into the United States for more than one year or having illegally remained in the U.S. in excess of 5 years without government permission.
The Department of Homeland Security announced on March 9, 2021, that they will no longer defend the public charge rule. This removes the requirement to prove citizenship legal entry and/or lawful residence for all or some benefits under the following programs. Technically most of these programs cannot give benefits to illegal aliens or unlawful residents, but the agencies are barred from determining legal residence or unlawful residence. The illegal lien must self-disclose, or a third party must come forward with credible evidence. In addition, illegal aliens may apply for exemption status if they are awaiting a deportation hearing, can offer proof of residence for a period of five or more years in the U.S. or are certain survivors of human trafficking.
This list is not all inclusive.
_ SNAP, SSNAP (not the same as SNAP) and WIC benefits
_Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
_Summer Food Service program
_Special Milk program
_Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP)
_The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
_Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR)
_ Headstart
_Low Cost Healthcare insurance under the ACA (They cannot receive government assistance in paying, but they can participate in the government insurance pools)
_TANF benefits (Temporary Assistance for needy Families)
_Lifeline (federal program that provides low-cost cell phones to qualifying applicants)
_Free healthcare, if qualified under:
+Hill-Burton act
+National Patient Travel Center programs
+Office of Minority Health programs
+U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - USDA funded Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).
_CHIP
_National Council on AGING benefits
_HUD Benefits
+rent and mortgage and foreclosure assistance programs
+Housing choice voucher programs
+Low Income Heating and Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
In addition, some state and non-governmental Organization (NGO) programs that receive federal grants or subsidies do not require proof of citizenship, legal entry or lawful residence.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
For both sides here:
Want something done? Get Congress to pass a bipartisan immigration bill, period!
We have needed immigration reform since Reagan days. Time to act.
Want something done? Get Congress to pass a bipartisan immigration bill, period!
We have needed immigration reform since Reagan days. Time to act.
(1)
(0)
CWO4 Terrence Clark
CWO4 Terrence Clark correction: so called dreamers, under certain circumstances, issued a PERMANENT green card. No chance for citizenship.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
CWO4 Terrence Clark - I wonder how much of your list would be negotiable? It is a good starting point.
(1)
(0)
CWO4 Terrence Clark
MSG Stan Hutchison
I made a good living at the negotiation table. Always met or exceeded my CAGR. Never had a strike.
I made a good living at the negotiation table. Always met or exceeded my CAGR. Never had a strike.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
CWO4 Terrence Clark - OK, now let me ask you this:
You posted "so called dreamers, under certain circumstances, issued a PERMANENT green card. No chance for citizenship."
Why no chance for citizenship?
You posted "so called dreamers, under certain circumstances, issued a PERMANENT green card. No chance for citizenship."
Why no chance for citizenship?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google