Posted on Sep 14, 2020
A brief history of cargo pants, the military’s greatest fashion contribution
3.08K
30
17
11
11
0
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 7
I have an unpopular opinion... "cargo pants" are evolving out of practical existence. I'll try and defend my point.
A long time ago (well, not THAT long ago I guess) it made sense... soldiers always find real-world problems the "engineer" didn't anticipate (let alone the brain trusts who design mass-produced gear). It stinks to try and dig out your Skoal, or dry rations you're trying to eat while on the move if they're stuck on your back. It's a real problem where to put everything from extra bandages to water bottles. Maybe it's more ammo, or a tool, or the beanie they seem to never want you to wear. At any rate, looking at Vietnam-era TA-50 gear... there's a lot of thought given to the "essentials", less so to some things that truly end up becoming "essential".
Enter everyone's fabulous new "girl" (as the list goes on)... MOLLE. ALICE cut you deep, and swung loose with your needs... but your new "squeeze" has it to go. With a seemingly endless variety (command SOP limited) of ways to stick stuff on plate carriers and belts... who needs anything swaying around down near your knees these days?
Then, there's changes to tactical training. CBQ's given us everything from shorter barrels to Velcro attached, integral knee pads. The fighter is (arguably) becoming more like a pro-level athlete (no politics implied or wanted), and gear is moving towards lighter weights, less things that "snag", and that breathe better as you move.
A long time ago (well, not THAT long ago I guess) it made sense... soldiers always find real-world problems the "engineer" didn't anticipate (let alone the brain trusts who design mass-produced gear). It stinks to try and dig out your Skoal, or dry rations you're trying to eat while on the move if they're stuck on your back. It's a real problem where to put everything from extra bandages to water bottles. Maybe it's more ammo, or a tool, or the beanie they seem to never want you to wear. At any rate, looking at Vietnam-era TA-50 gear... there's a lot of thought given to the "essentials", less so to some things that truly end up becoming "essential".
Enter everyone's fabulous new "girl" (as the list goes on)... MOLLE. ALICE cut you deep, and swung loose with your needs... but your new "squeeze" has it to go. With a seemingly endless variety (command SOP limited) of ways to stick stuff on plate carriers and belts... who needs anything swaying around down near your knees these days?
Then, there's changes to tactical training. CBQ's given us everything from shorter barrels to Velcro attached, integral knee pads. The fighter is (arguably) becoming more like a pro-level athlete (no politics implied or wanted), and gear is moving towards lighter weights, less things that "snag", and that breathe better as you move.
(3)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
Exact, Sir. I don't use my cargo pockets at all unless I have absolutely no other choice. In a regular basis, everything I need is on my torso or belt and if it is a less likely item I'll need, it'll be in a pack.
(1)
(0)
I know this is about cargo pants but the American military has really contributed a lot to fashion over the years. Tie bars, all types of boots, camo, M-65 jacket, webbed belts, watches, etc.
(3)
(0)
(Join to see)
Very true and it will probably continue to revolutionize until the end of time! Not fashion, but look at the humble beginnings of the original Jeeps!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next