Responses: 4
Obama State Dept. official admits free-flowing exchange of reports with Trump dossier author
An Obama State Department official has acknowledged he had regular contact with the author of the controversial anti-Trump dossier – coming forward in an apparent bid to blunt expected criticism from the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
(3)
(0)
This author has some good points, but also makes some huge leaps that I disagree with. It is way too complex and has evolved through way too much to be this simple. For example, we didn't create the FDA because a child got sick. as the author claims. It was a result of the1906 Pure Food and Drugs Act, which was a culmination of 100 bills over 25 years that aimed to rein in long-standing, serious abuses in the consumer product marketplace. We might not always think they do a good job (I don't--I think they are too lax), but what if we didn't have them? We can rely on the food we buy thanks to them. We didn't create the DOE because children weren't performing well in schools. It was done to establish policy for and administer most federal assistance to education and enforce education laws on privacy & civil rights in schools. Could they leave it to every state? Sure. But the 2d and 3d order effects of that could be much worse than what we have. Could they decrease its numbers? Probably, and that applies to most places. Some "body" would still have to coordinate info across state lines for crime, no matter what you call it. So I disagree that all these solutions have caused the problems we have today. That cause and effect just doesn't make any sense to me. That's like saying my great great grandfather's transgressions are still the reason I sin. It all has a place--government bureaucracy (which wasn't supposed to be efficient), business, and the courts. If the baby needs a bath and you have dirty bathwater, you change the bathwater rather than throw out the baby. IMO
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(1)
(0)
SSG Diane R.
Susan Foster, thanks for asking. It's going very well, orientation was fabulous and I met some great high energy people. I'm scheduled for training all next week.
I'm afraid that by joining the ranks of government, I've also become part of the problem. Lol
Seriously, there are no easy answers as a well intrenched bureaucracy is nearly impervious to reform. It might be affected by bringing new blood into the system especially veterans, with some top down guidance.
I'm afraid that by joining the ranks of government, I've also become part of the problem. Lol
Seriously, there are no easy answers as a well intrenched bureaucracy is nearly impervious to reform. It might be affected by bringing new blood into the system especially veterans, with some top down guidance.
(0)
(0)
Susan Foster
SSG Diane R. - I'm so glad it went well! I'm excited for you. Maybe you will be running the place before long. We now have a lot of vets in the system, especially the VA I believe. I'd love to see more in management, because a lot of CS managers don't have a clue. On the other hand, they don't get leadership training like the military, so how could we expect them to know what it looks like? You are right about top down guidance, but I'm not seeing much that makes sense. Pres Bush tried to reform some by a national pay merit system, but he was unsuccessful. I have absolutely no doubt the CS is crucial. Govt would be worse if it was the "change out" every 4 years, but I found when I did some leadership training that for the most part, we don't reward the right behaviors, and managers don't hold the bad ones accountable--there is no reward for them in that either. I did fire someone once but it takes awhile. This one may be too big to tackle in our lifetimes! haha!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next