Article in Harvard Law Journal concludes: The preborn child is a constitutional person

This should inspire some spirited debate. Here's hoping that it's rational and respectful. I tend to side with the point of view that Roe v Wade should have stuck to the Constitutionality of the laws pertaining to abortion. Indeed, some argue that it did and dumped the issue back in the laps of state lawmakers to craft constitutionally sound laws regulating the practice of abortion. Sadly, everyone seems to have decided the Roe v Wade declared all prohibitions on abortion to be unconstitutional and there's an end to that. You would think that people would have discovered by now that behavior cannot be regulated, not even bad behavior. For example, there is no prohibition on homocide per se. It is rather regulated according to clearly defined guidelines. The law distinguishes between justified and unjustified homocide. It proscribes degrees of unjustified: Murder vs manslaughter vs negligent manslaughter and doles out punishments accordingly. Surely, by now, no one can expect a blanket prohibition on abortion to succeed any more than unfettered, publicly funded abortion has succeeded. There you have it. Now, have at it...