Breaking: Nope, it AIN'T over; Hillary joins forces to OVERTURN... - Allen B. West -...

Thank you for providing an excellent example of how propaganda works. Note that the title and the conclusion are not even in agreement with the quote. Read this excerpt from the article:

"The campaign has met with lawyers, data scientists and analysts to assess anomalies in the results that would suggest a hacked result. Private meetings with outside experts involved sharing both groups concerns about the data and findings."

So there is evidence that could indicate a hacked result. How then did the author come back to this conclusion?

"Remember not a single shred of evidence has been uncovered to suggest the kind of fraud they believe might have possibly maybe, just a teeny bit, occurred."

Then there is the issue of the articles title, since when is investigating anomalies the same thing as seeking to overturn? Trump should be interested in any anomalies that occurred as well.

I thought she was laying Low... most likely destroying evidence ... and gaining support...