Posted on Oct 18, 2016
BREAKING: State Dept refuse to consider Wikileaks release of Hillary's emails, in utter denial
2.74K
13
9
6
6
0
Election 2016
Republicans
Democrats
Ethics
Responses: 6
2
2
0
They Can't Handle the truth...or Reality... If they do the they will meet with an untimely accident...
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
He says it pretty clear, the document in question was a FBI 302, which is a personal interview/summary of what happened. In other words here-say, one agent's opinion of what he thought he heard. This is exactly why judges will not use anything like this as evidence or proof. Just because something is written in an internal document does not mean it is in any way true or factual. But the State Dept. and the FBI have stated there was no quid pro quo. There isn't anything there people.
(2)
(0)
SPC James Harsh
We know from Comey's testifying for example that the FBI only does interviews in that manner so you are discrediting every single FBI Investigation?
(1)
(0)
SPC James Harsh
Eliciting is a word that comes to mind as far as what may or may not of happened, which for bribery and the likes is a crime 'quid pro quo'. We are familiar with the idea of people getting arrested for soliciting or conversely agree to agreeing to go along with prostitution in a police sting operation without any acts involved and still be charged, that is different but similar.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google