Avatar feed
Responses: 6
SSG Steven Mangus
2
2
0
Allowed to retire..typical..should be reduced and all pay and allowances forfeited..no accountability for senior members..disappointing..
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Warren Swan
1
1
0
He was wrong, but if the charges were proven true, the CG was wrong for allowing him to retire. Not exactly a good message to send to subordinates who already believe there are two versions of the UCMJ
(1)
Comment
(0)
Maj Robert Thornton
Maj Robert Thornton
>1 y
As much as I hate it, there has been a double standard for O1-O5 vs O6 and above. I will not go into detail but I know of some O4's who were convicted of a felony, adult. I know of an O6 who was asked to retire immediately for the same thing, adultery. I would have hoped this double standard would have been put to rest, but obviously not.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Maj Robert Thornton
Maj Robert Thornton
>1 y
Adult should be adultery. Dang autocorrect.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
>1 y
Maj Robert Thornton It never will. RHIP is in NO official manuals, but it’s in EVERY manual.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Daniel Goodman
0
0
0
Sigh...a new low, obviously....
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close