Posted on Sep 15, 2017
Columbia law school objects to military recruiters on campus over transgender ban; gives credit...
1.06K
5
3
4
4
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 1
I don't fully agree with the move, but it's a freedom of speech matter. As a private institution, Columbia is free to do as they please within the parameters of law. I don't know what federal funding they receive that could be withdrawn, but I think the USG would lose that argument in court as the withdrawal would be an attempt to quell Columbia's 'speech' on matter unrelated to the funding (unless the funding is provided to facilitate the recruiting efforts). As a punishment for the exercise of lawful speech, it would violate the constitution. Not to mention their position is justified as the transgender ban is founded in discrimination, regardless of whether or not you agree with it.
However, any private funding Columbia receives could be withdrawn as it is just that, private.
However, any private funding Columbia receives could be withdrawn as it is just that, private.
(0)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Columbia has no "right" to federal funding. Look at the for-profit schools that lost it. poor example, sure, but why is Columbia different?
(0)
(0)
CW2 Chris Wilson
No one has suggested a right to federal money. It’s a matter of whether or not the reason it’s being withdrawn is a violation of law.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next