Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Lt Col Timothy Parker, DBA
1
1
0
So does this imply President Eisenhower should not have been involved in politics, or Powell, or Petraeus, or Haig, or numerous others? If so, at what rank does that come into effect? It seems to me once a military member retires that member is no longer bound by the rules that bar them from active participation in politics as I recall.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTJG Aviator
1
1
0
"Former Joint Chiefs chairman: Retired generals shouldn't speak at political conventions"
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/2016/07/31/former-joint-chiefs-chairman-retired-generals-shouldnt-speak-political-conventions/87887438/

Might be unprofessional, but I absolutely disagree. The military, while small in number compared to the entire population, DOES represent a large political objective. If you're a retired general or any officer for that matter, you should be able to do whatever you want. I think they should actually be running, not endorsing political candidates. But they have every right to. They are retired. They rate it. They put their time in, now they're out. They are allowed to have an opinion and share it. The only ones that are objecting to this are the ones that are fearful of political influence that opposes their own.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO1 John Miller
PO1 John Miller
>1 y
LTJG (Join to see)
Agreed to a point, but I don't think a retired General should use their military background to prove their points. I think the only exception to that would be if they themselves are running for Office.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTJG Aviator
LTJG (Join to see)
>1 y
PO1 John Miller - Exactly. I completely agree.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
0
0
0
Old news, duplicate topic.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSG Military Police
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
The story is dated Aug 01, 2016.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close