2
2
0
https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/videos/ [login to see] 041336/
So, is it still a bad idea to be hyper vigilant in ensuring those who cross our borders are here for the right reasons? Do you still believe that love and job creation in the Middle East will curb these attacks?
So, is it still a bad idea to be hyper vigilant in ensuring those who cross our borders are here for the right reasons? Do you still believe that love and job creation in the Middle East will curb these attacks?
Fox News
Posted from facebook.com
Terrorism
Refugees
Immigration
Foreign Policy
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
There is no harm in vigilance, and there is value in knowing who is entering our country. I think the argument that these murderers may have been in England for a long time, and therefore border control is worthless, is a specious argument at best. Border control and immigration enforcement is only one aspect of the long war. By knowing who is entering and attempting to discern their motives and intent, we stand a chance at preventing an attack 10 or 50 years from now.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
All the security in the world doesn't stop nuts from waiting outside security to murder people.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Now explain why you think this somehow involved a border crossing? Almost all the European attacks have been carried out by citizens of the nations attacked. Why are you so sure that is case is different?
If you know that the attacker came to Britain from the middle-east please tell the British police who he was and how you got that evidence that they have been unable find yet.
Or are yo just blowing smoke?
Pehaps it might be wiser until there is at least some evidence to support your analysis, if there ever is ant such evidence,
If you know that the attacker came to Britain from the middle-east please tell the British police who he was and how you got that evidence that they have been unable find yet.
Or are yo just blowing smoke?
Pehaps it might be wiser until there is at least some evidence to support your analysis, if there ever is ant such evidence,
(1)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
So you assume that getting across a country m's borders is only achieved by ground? Hmmm, wrong. Sorry to break it to you, but IRA attacks haven't been initiate for decades. So, you can continue your smartass, condescending speech or you can use your head "1stSgt". Good try though.
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
I assumed no such thing you assumed that the attach involved crossing borders when the reality is that it was problY carried out by a citizen of the UK. You tried to sco r enpartisam.poltical points off of the deaths of inocent pepole and have no facts to back up your inferences or claims.
You still have not explained what you IMAGINE this has to do with imigration?
You still have not explained what you IMAGINE this has to do with imigration?
(0)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
The thing with Europe is that these illegal invaders have been arriving for a decade or more, and taking up residence there. They get the "lay of the land," observe TTPs, and then do their IPB. So no, they are not technically "unknown" to the country, and may even be naturalized, but are hostile to the host nation, and definitely have not assimilated into the culture. So for all intents and purposes, they are "the enemy." They are simply sleeper agents.
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Which attacks have been committed by illegal invaders? Most were born in Europe how is a man born in fFrance to French citizens an invader. The last big Paris attack was by native born Belgians for example..
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google