Posted on Apr 6, 2018
Full interview: Scott Pruitt pushes back on controversies
890
6
3
4
4
0
Congress
Conservative
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
1
1
0
Please tell me, how rolling back the regulation that prevented coal companies from dumping their runoff into our rivers and streams is protecting the environment and promoting prosperity?
Here is what I got out of the rest of it. While that specific lobbying group did not have any "current business" with the EPA, EXXON did. Now, EXXON is a client with that specific lobbying group. Now here is Pruitt, in need of a place to live. And here comes the wife of a lobbyist in that group, basically saying I have a cheap place for you to live for now. So how does a huge business like EXXON curry favor without acting directly with Pruitt................add a middle man with no current business with the EPA to provide him with a much needed commodity in an attempt to garner favor.
Face it, Pruitt is dirty.
Here is what I got out of the rest of it. While that specific lobbying group did not have any "current business" with the EPA, EXXON did. Now, EXXON is a client with that specific lobbying group. Now here is Pruitt, in need of a place to live. And here comes the wife of a lobbyist in that group, basically saying I have a cheap place for you to live for now. So how does a huge business like EXXON curry favor without acting directly with Pruitt................add a middle man with no current business with the EPA to provide him with a much needed commodity in an attempt to garner favor.
Face it, Pruitt is dirty.
(1)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
He is, but what got me is (well a few things),
1. He never fully accepted blame for anything. It was always a staffer who made the mistake. Seems to be a running trend to do this, HRC included.
2. He could by law hire those friends of his. Obscure law, but it's THE law. When asked the raises, all he could say was "I took care of it". Now he IS the only one who could authorize those raises, so.......is there more than one Scott Pruitt in the Matrix?
3. Everything he did was blessed off by the Ethics Dept. Um ok, but they changed their tone pretty quick, so did he lie?
4. I have disdain for many journalists period, and especially some on Fox. This is supposed to be Trumps home station. Apparently Fox said F you with no Vaseline with these questions.
Honestly no matter what, he needs to go. He cost people careers, and a ton of taxpayer money. Maybe Trump can do everyone a favor and send his termination tweet to that soundproof room Pruitt has
1. He never fully accepted blame for anything. It was always a staffer who made the mistake. Seems to be a running trend to do this, HRC included.
2. He could by law hire those friends of his. Obscure law, but it's THE law. When asked the raises, all he could say was "I took care of it". Now he IS the only one who could authorize those raises, so.......is there more than one Scott Pruitt in the Matrix?
3. Everything he did was blessed off by the Ethics Dept. Um ok, but they changed their tone pretty quick, so did he lie?
4. I have disdain for many journalists period, and especially some on Fox. This is supposed to be Trumps home station. Apparently Fox said F you with no Vaseline with these questions.
Honestly no matter what, he needs to go. He cost people careers, and a ton of taxpayer money. Maybe Trump can do everyone a favor and send his termination tweet to that soundproof room Pruitt has
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
How does it protect the environment? It dios not but it does fund scumbag politicians like the head of the EPA.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google