Hice: GSA Administrator Must Adhere to Constitution, Past Precedent in Determining...

Wishing it were so but not following the Constitutional laws does not make it so. We have had to wait several different elections. We can wait this time. What is the rush? Or is it deep down you know fraud is <bold>possible</bold> and all the court cases <italics>might</italics> change something?

SSgt (Join to see) - "What is the rush?"

Like I said, we had a rather straightforward election, which we know that Biden won. We know this because he won more votes than Trump. There isn't any rush, but we've accepted the results of the 2016 election with no problem, the 2012 election with no problem, the 2008 one with no problem, and so on. For some reason, people are pretending that we can't accept this one with no problems.

"Or is it deep down you know fraud is possible and all the court cases might change something"

But there isn't any evidence of fraud that would change the outcome of this election, despite all the fake news out there (including the mountains of fake news promoted by the president himself).

James Anders - what was accepted in the 20/20 election was the tally of the Electoral College. The media does not call the election, as much as some folks wish they did. This election has not been called because the Electoral College has not yet met and there are court cases pending that contest the election on several levels. Let things play out before coming to any conclusion, would be the prudent thing to do. IMHO

"...A few important historical examples demonstrate that Americans have endured electoral delays in the past and have survived. We can do it again and should be prepared to be patient..."

"...On Nov. 7, citizens cast their votes. George W. Bush had clearly won 246 votes and Albert Gore won 250. Wisconsin and Oregon were too close to call, but the election came down to Florida and its 25 electoral votes. By the next morning, Bush was winning in Florida by fewer than 2,000 votes, triggering an automatic recount. Lawsuits on the recount went to the Supreme Court, which upheld the previous tally, thus ending the recount on Dec. 12, 2000. On Jan. 6, 2001, a joint session of Congress certified the electoral votes and Bush took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2001..."

And oh yea, you should look up how long the election took in 1800!

https://www.governing.com/now/History-Teaches-Us-Election-Delays-Are-Nothing-New.html

2004: Kerry conceded defeat in the race in a telephone call to Bush at around 11 a.m. EST (16:00 UTC) on the morning of November 3, 2004.

2008: Having trailed significantly throughout the day, McCain conceded defeat shortly after 4am GMT

2012: Mitt Romney ended his second bid for the presidency in the early hours of Wednesday morning, telling a room of supporters that he officially conceded the race to President Barack Obama.

2016: Hillary Clinton called on her supporters to accept the US election result on Wednesday, as she delivered a concession speech in New York in which she pressed Donald Trump to hold fast to American values.

2020: Not conceded. Following the process as laid out by law. Until that process has run its full course there is no President-Elect. If Trump concedes - bingo - you have a President-Elect Joe Biden. If court cases end up finding fraud - well - that's a whole new ball game.

And yes, I read some of the same news as you. Can you honestly sit there and tell, tell us, that you KNOW there is no evidence? Are you part of the legal teams? I cannot say there is evidence. I cannot say there is no evidence.

PS: HRC won more votes than DT in 2016. Just saying...

He has not won until all Secretaries of State certify their votes and the Electoral College has voted. That is the constitutional way it works, not some convoluted leftist way.

Miss Lisa: Wishing it were so but not following the Constitutional laws does not make it so. We have had to wait several different elections. We can wait this time. What is the rush? Or is it deep down you know fraud is <bold>possible</bold> and all the court cases <italics>might</italics> change something?

Oh, I hear you on the tit-for-tat mentality. Nothing new. Nothing frightening. Something we have been pointing out for ages. It <bold>does</bold> go both ways. And just to be crystal clear, that is a veiled threat. (Now if the Republicans continue down this road they must remember that this incident will not be forgotten and will come back to haunt them in the future.)

Do you really think Republicans have forgotten the way the Democratic led house tried everything in their power to get rid of a sitting President? After all the evidence was aired it came down to "Orange man bad! He must go!" Careful what you wish for.

SSgt (Join to see) Trump violated the Constitution and they did their duty.

Miss Lisa - where is the evidence? Almost 4 years of digging for the evidence. Tis a might longer than the 5 weeks Trump has to dig for the evidence on election fraud.