Hillary Clinton left 9/11 service feeling 'overheated'

Sgt Gus Laskaris - You are an LSBME licensed physician . . . but while you are cautious enough to say she shows signs that may be attributable to Parkinson's, you very quickly move to the presumption she is being treated for Parkinson's and state that she is suffering adverse effects of Parkinson's medications. While the full medical record is not in the public domain . . . she has clearly been through the usual battery of physical exams, blood tests, cardiac testing, neuro exams, neuro scans, etc . . . with public disclosure that provides far more detail re these results including excellent lipid profile numbers. While I appreciate your political bent in your opinion piece . . . I do not appreciate the reference to your state licensed medical credentials and practice in conjunction with what appears to be a politically biased critique of her medical status. In spite of constant appearance in the public eye over the course of many years, there are very few exceptionally brief episodes of any kind of symptoms that might represent some underlying concerns . . . these resolved within a few seconds to a few minutes . . . and she has obviously had the best medical diagnostic workups and state of the art treatment. Quite frankly, there is a huge difference between private disclosure of your medical records to an employer or insurer . . . vs disclosure of medical records to the public at large. There are many things in medical records that have absolutely no bearing on fitness for public office (e.g. the size and state of an opposition candidate's reproductive organs) and any medications (e.g. taken to promote reproductive health and capacity) and speculation re the existence of serious medical disorder based on a very few seconds of video collected over many months and years would in my opinion amount to serious medical malpractice. The bottom line is that whatever your speculations, with exception for the long resolved blood clot discovered after a concussion 2012 there is no evidence of any current issue. For a physician not engaged in her care to suggest otherwise is unethical at best . . . and potentially actionable by state medical licensing authorities. If you knew anything you would be violating medical privacy rules and if you don't know anything you should not be rendering a purportedly credible medical opinion. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
Capt Tom Brown

Sgt Gus Laskaris -Just released . . . she was diagnosed Fri w/ pneumonia . . . ordered to modify her schedule and rest . . . attended 9/11 memorial services . . . dehydrated . . . nothing more serious! Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/11/politics/hillary-clinton-health/index.html?adkey=bn

So she cannot even choose and appropriate wardrobe ?? And she wants to be President ??? If she was in good health .. she would do what she has demanded herself of others .. Release her medical records .. oh .. wait .. there is no transparency with this Crook

Sgt Gus Laskaris - What makes you believe you can diagnose my colleague based on some brief media clips . . , with no physical exam, no lab tests, no neuro tests, and no brain scans . . . contrary to legal and ethical standard of care for any diagnosis? You are seriously annoying me!!! People like you give medicine a bad name!!! Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
p.s. Don't call me Babe!!! I was operating in a combat zone when you were an infant!!!