Posted on Feb 1, 2016
History's Grim Irony: New WWI Memorial Will Stand Where War's Jobless Veterans Fought Eviction
2.31K
11
4
5
5
0
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 4
There were some jobless veterans in Occupy Movement but others were professional liberal activists and more than a few were thugs COL Mikel J. Burroughs.
I don't consider it an irony it is the lack of prime real estate for memorials in Washington, D.C.
We haven't heard of Occupy since Obama was reelected. That was one of their less-vocal goals. Not much has changed since Occupy began except more long term unemployment and lack of health coverage.
I don't consider it an irony it is the lack of prime real estate for memorials in Washington, D.C.
We haven't heard of Occupy since Obama was reelected. That was one of their less-vocal goals. Not much has changed since Occupy began except more long term unemployment and lack of health coverage.
(2)
(0)
Interesting that this site was chosen for said memorial. It is shameful incident in our history. This whole incident was over the payments of "bonuses". These bonuses for World War One veterans were meant to cover the difference in their military pay and civilian pay while they were serving in a time of war. The 1924 Congress had passed and overrode the Presidential Veto of a bill to give these veterans a bonus. This compensation was given in the form a bonds that would mature in the year 1945. When the Great Depression hit, the Veterans' need for money became desperate. The main demand of the "Bonus Army" was the early payment of these bonds. As with today, the powers that be were divided on the issue. Some wanted to pay, others, including then President Hoover did not. So President Hoover ordered the US Army to disperse the the residents of this "Hooverville". President Hoover's handling of the situation was one of the many contributing factors to his loosing the next Presidential Election to Franklin Roosevelt. The memory of this incident was one of the factors behind the passing of the "Serviceman's Readjustment Act of 1944" better known as the G. I. Bill.
What I find both sad and ironic is that General McArthur's role in the eviction is even mentioned in this article. So often, that part of his past is glossed over. It is good to see it mentioned and remembered. Heroes should be remembered not only for their "great deeds" but their failings as well. So people can learn from their mistakes and remember that in the end, they were human beings too.
What I find both sad and ironic is that General McArthur's role in the eviction is even mentioned in this article. So often, that part of his past is glossed over. It is good to see it mentioned and remembered. Heroes should be remembered not only for their "great deeds" but their failings as well. So people can learn from their mistakes and remember that in the end, they were human beings too.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next