3
3
0
This is troubling reporting from POLITICO about how Russian interests are trying to reach and influence service members and veterans. And a good validator for why it is valuable to spend your time online talking with people and reading sources that you know and trust.
How Russia Targets the U.S. Military
Posted from politico.com
Russia
Cyber
Servicemembers
Hacking
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
1
1
0
1
1
0
This ties in with an interview I posted of a former KGB agent explaining how Russia planned infiltration into our society to tear it down...
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Which do you see as a bigger threat: Russia or whatever the term of the moment is for AQI, ISIS, Muslim Terrorist, ect. Russia has always been a threat to our Republic. Why do we give a pass to others that want to destroy our country. Have you read the Project?
https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/
https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/
The Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Plan For America - Court Document | Clarion Project
The following is the official document from a 1991 meeting which outlines the Muslim Brotherhood's strategic goals for North America. The document was entered as evidence in the 2008 Holyland Terror Funding Trial. Federal investigators found the document in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, …
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
I think this is paranoia. Russian efforts have been clumsy at best because among their marching orders they can never criticize Russian political leaders so in most discussions it is easy to pick out the Russian trolls in relatively short order.
(0)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
I'm sure there is paranoia involved too, but this statement during the Comey hearing was pretty clear about how concerned we should be: "The Russians interfered with our election in 2016 ... there is no fuzz on that, it is a high confidence judgment"
(1)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
LT (Join to see) - I guess choice of words there bothers me. Interfered or attempted to influence. I think the latter is more appropriate. Interfered implies they were successful when just about everyone has testified under oath they were unsuccessful. I've seen on discussion forums other than this one. Americans, Veterans and Active Duty alike are not completely stupid and can make a rational judgement after a discussion if someone is influenced or has an agenda. Russian trolls on the internet are pretty easily identifiable after a short conversation because they have ground rules on what they cannot say, the Americans in the discussion do not.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google