Posted on Mar 17, 2023
BRENNER v. United States, 1:19-cv-00487 - CourtListener.com
Suspended Profile
589
13
4
How should I feel about not getting evidence considered by the AFBCMR as they deleted my lawyer's emails without reading them through Court?
The Air Force BCMR also has continuously failed to address a single allegation that has been made against them in my lawsuit vs the DoD; to include evidence presented. These morons at the BCMR can't even get simple facts correct i.e. touting that I'm only 50% disabled through the VA while touting that my conditions weren't aggravated by military service which is interesting since the VA declared my illnesses were "permanently exacerbated by military service". I've been 100% P&T for a solid year now but in my recent 4th BCMR denial allegedly I'm only 50% disabled through the VA; what a joke. To all my haters who doubt my claims, read and weep. Now I know some moderators on here will cry and attempt to make me seem like I'm null and void, just like my discharge was null and voided, however, I can assure you an upgrade in discharge to 'Secretarial Authority' 'KFF' doesn't happen often whatsoever. Watch the moderators attempt to discredit me once more as they always do i.e. "You malingered for that, didn't you?". Call the VA and dispute mine then, since most of you claim to know more than I about my own lawsuit and know all the facts of what I suffered in the military -- that you present to have all this power; if that's true, press the issue and pursue me. Let's see who really has all of their ducks in a row and yes, that's a challenge. Some of you have serious lack of personal integrity and have the audacity to call mine out and others; some people here really need a huge reality check.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17350610/brenner-v-united-states/
The Air Force BCMR also has continuously failed to address a single allegation that has been made against them in my lawsuit vs the DoD; to include evidence presented. These morons at the BCMR can't even get simple facts correct i.e. touting that I'm only 50% disabled through the VA while touting that my conditions weren't aggravated by military service which is interesting since the VA declared my illnesses were "permanently exacerbated by military service". I've been 100% P&T for a solid year now but in my recent 4th BCMR denial allegedly I'm only 50% disabled through the VA; what a joke. To all my haters who doubt my claims, read and weep. Now I know some moderators on here will cry and attempt to make me seem like I'm null and void, just like my discharge was null and voided, however, I can assure you an upgrade in discharge to 'Secretarial Authority' 'KFF' doesn't happen often whatsoever. Watch the moderators attempt to discredit me once more as they always do i.e. "You malingered for that, didn't you?". Call the VA and dispute mine then, since most of you claim to know more than I about my own lawsuit and know all the facts of what I suffered in the military -- that you present to have all this power; if that's true, press the issue and pursue me. Let's see who really has all of their ducks in a row and yes, that's a challenge. Some of you have serious lack of personal integrity and have the audacity to call mine out and others; some people here really need a huge reality check.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17350610/brenner-v-united-states/
Justice
Law
Military service
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
I can't speak to who changed your question to an update/link share, but whoever it was did it was in line with the guidelines* on questions.
Like SSG (Join to see), I don't know you or the background either, but I can tell from your post that it falls into the category of "promote an agenda, point of view, or personal opinions".
If you actually want to ask a question, then do so and don't just reword something that "promotes an agenda, point of view, or personal opinion" so you can put a question mark at the end of the sentence.
RallyPoint is not affiliated with the DoD other than being a forum for veterans to communicate and forming partnerships with DoD and DoD related organizations. The member administrators are volunteers and have no formal relationship with RP.
As has been pointed out to many, the enforcement actions of the administrators is tied to community standards, NOT personal opinions. The liberal administrators do not 'silence' the conservatives and the conservative administrators do not 'silence' the liberals. The only ones that have administrator actions come there way are ones that don't adhere to the standards.
------------------------------------
* https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/guidelines-on-questions-2020-03-13-10-21-35
Like SSG (Join to see), I don't know you or the background either, but I can tell from your post that it falls into the category of "promote an agenda, point of view, or personal opinions".
If you actually want to ask a question, then do so and don't just reword something that "promotes an agenda, point of view, or personal opinion" so you can put a question mark at the end of the sentence.
RallyPoint is not affiliated with the DoD other than being a forum for veterans to communicate and forming partnerships with DoD and DoD related organizations. The member administrators are volunteers and have no formal relationship with RP.
As has been pointed out to many, the enforcement actions of the administrators is tied to community standards, NOT personal opinions. The liberal administrators do not 'silence' the conservatives and the conservative administrators do not 'silence' the liberals. The only ones that have administrator actions come there way are ones that don't adhere to the standards.
------------------------------------
* https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/guidelines-on-questions-2020-03-13-10-21-35
Suspended Profile
Hey Colonel, wouldn't you say my allegations are becoming ever more clear and concise? COL Mikel J. Burroughs
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google
However, I am rendering no opinion for or against you. The circumstances of your discharge are not what is in question. What is in question is your adherence to the standards of conduct and guidelines in posting a question. If you adhere to the standards of conduct and guidelines about posting, then you'll never have a run-in with a member administrator.
The platform is full of people that want to express their opinion and find people that agree with them. It is also full of people that are looking for assistance. You do not seem to fall into the later category based on your statements. Everything you're stating appears that you are looking for validation of your case by standards.
To your latest questions since you're directing them towards me:
• Just like the standards were adhered to in my discharge am I right? I and likely nobody else can comment.
• I don't get to have a voice? Sure you do. You're using it right now.
• My uniforms stolen from me when I had paid for them out of my first two paychecks with an administrative honorable discharge is legal? On the face value of your statement, uniforms being stolen is not legal.
• Does a granted stay in court mean nothing? In what context? Are you expecting something from your post? What is it? Validation from a social media platform?
• Does 1 DRB and 4 BCMR denial decisions so far under my belt equate to justice when I have enormous physical evidence? I would defer to the court case you have as neither I nor I would say anyone else on RP understand your side and the governments side of the case.
Again, the first time I encountered you was with this post. I have no clue who you are or what your background is. I would say that is true for the vast majority of people on the platform.
Looking into your history, you posted a a few times* two years ago about this case. It seems that when people started to disagree with what you were saying that it devolved into personal attacks many times.
Again, I will emphasize that RallyPoint is nothing more than a social media platform whose members are overwhelmingly current or former members of the military. There is no affiliation with DoD aside from having business partners with organizations that may be components of them. DoD doesn't drive the actions of the owners/staff of RallyPoint and unless you happen to post something that a currently serving member sees, it won't been seen by that organization either.
--------------------
Community Standards - https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/enforcement-of-rallypoint-community-standards-2020-03-13-10-21-35
Guidelines on Posting a Question - https://rallypoint.my.site.com/Support/s/article/inappropriate-content-published-in-answers-using-ask-question-2020-03-13-10-21-35
RP 3-1: Proper Participation and Use of RallyPoint - https://docs.google.com/document/d/13S7FUn2IyKDn48lQ-bEJsf_qBbf-hZkniUIfjJ3oJSY/edit
* https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/how-successful-are-ptsd-diagnoses-in-court-for-military-discharge-upgrades-e-g-court-of-federal-claims-appeals-court-supreme-court
* https://www.rallypoint.com/shared-links/alarming-that-the-va-is-declaring-all-veterans-who-don-t-exhibit-criteria-a-under-dsm-v-not-to-have-ptsd-through-military-service
* https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/how-legal-is-it-for-the-afbcmr-to-delete-my-lawyers-emails-without-reading-them-in-response-to-their-advisory-opinions-as-part-of-evidence
RallyPoint Support Center
Any further violation of the community standards will get you suspended or banned.