HVES in the US, 2015

It is not overblown but, a real threat !Thanks SSG Norman Lihou

In case you are not aware, the source of “radicalization” for Islamist's is not some unique form of inculcation. The tools used are the Quran and the Hadith’s. In essence, these radicals are those who are trying to obtain the purest form of Islam.

Prior to 570 AD, how many Muslims were radicalized? Zero! This is because Mohammad had not been born yet.

One of the biggest fallacies taught today by progressives and Anti-Christians is that this religion is the “Muslim” religion. I have posted a few different articles on this and I cover this in my first book as well. I am working on a book that will academically challenge the use of “Muslim” today. Why don’t we call Persians Zoroastrians? The answer is simple this faith was destroyed by Islamist's. This is the faith that metastasized during Mohammad’s rise to power as he revolted against the Muslim faith and converted it into a faith the abandoned all of its teachings before Mohammad.
Unfortunately, the paradigm that there might be a small percentage of radicals here in our Republic is miss information. The point in fact is that there are million potential radicals once they choose to live the full doctrines of the Quran and the Hadith’s.

The following is my post on our Facebook page that was also posted to Glenn Beck’s Facebook page. I hope this helps you shift your paradigm to a macro level and begin to realize the magnitude of the problem and appreciate why Jefferson and the framers would not allow this faith to be practiced here.

The Muslim Faith Has Been Dead For Over 1300 years

I posted this a while back on Glenn Beck’s page and thought that now would be a good time to repost the fact that the Muslim Faith has been dead for well over the past millennia. Consequently, whenever I see someone use the term Muslim, I believe it is time to begin to shine an academic and theological light on the truth because this faith or religion was systematically destroyed. How? Mohammad revolted against it and his family and began to introduce his own doctrine and texts. None of which were texts that tied to ancient prophecy or was a fulfillment of a prophecy like Christ’s Atonement. Actually, all of his new doctrines in these texts are the antithesis of ancient doctrines and fail in every facet to compliment or harmonize with the doctrines and teachings that originated with Adam, passed down to Abraham, and accompanied Israel which then culminated with Christ. Mohammad’s revolt began against his family, killing an Uncle and then subjugated his family when he asserted and seated a different God from the God of Israel into his new doctrines. Because of this today true Muslims do not exist except by bloodlines. Today the followers of Mohammad and his doctrines and texts are either Mohammadists or Islamist's but they are not Muslims.

Muslims before Mohammad were harmonious with the teachings of the prophets of Israel and accepted all of the standard prophets as their prophet’s as well. They even accepted Christ as a prophet which wedged them between the remnants of Israel (the house of Judah) and the followers of Christ (Christians). It was not until Mohammad achieved enough of his civil and cultural war against the true Muslims with force that he then began to set his sights on Jews as Christians and making them and all non-believers their #1 enemy. Instead of an eye for an eye or even turn the other cheek doctrine, Mohammad inserted the doctrine all must submit, be subjugated, or die…

One key factor which refutes Mohammad’s doctrines and texts is the Priesthoods of Israel and Christ. I point this out in my first book that before Ishmael was cast out of Abrahams’s house; Ishmael received the covenant of circumcision but did not receive the Priesthood. Only Isaac received this Priesthood from Abraham. This is very clear in the true Muslim doctrine that they were not the house with the Priesthood, which is why they had a symbiotic relationship and were allies with the house of Israel.

This begs an important question; how could Mohammad become a prophet when Christ and previous doctrines clearly pointed out that no man could take this honor unto himself? Read Hebrews chapter 5 and 7 as to why Christ restored the Melchizedek Priesthood as the corner stone of his Church. I contend that this is why Mohammad introduced a new God that was not recognized within Judaeo doctrine, to align the descendants of Ishmael's against Isaac's. Now Mohammad may be a prophet of Allah, but Allah is not the God that Ismael and his household worshiped. Do not forget that these two houses are half-brothers and shared a common bond in blood and doctrine.

The reason there was a lack of consistency over the years was due to the fact that most of the Muslim’s were taught by word of mouth. This also affected the Christians and Jews, which is why religions over time have deviated. Doctrines in these days evolved or in some cases were completely misconstrued where the written text was not available.

It is also important to point out that the Bible we have today was not canonized until the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries... so the academic question remains how could Mohammad receive the Melchizedek or even the Levitical Priesthood when Abraham had not received it until after Ishmael was banished? The Priesthood is the one consistency that goes all the way back to Adam's time. Even John Locke pointed out in his "Two Treatise of Government" that the administration of the Priesthood was given to Adam and his family. For they were commanded to give offerings of sacrifice in the similitude of the only begotten, which commandment was followed by the house of Israel up until Christ's fulfillment of this law by his Atonement.

Consequently the descendants of Ishmael (i.e. Muslims), as they progressed in the company of the House of Israel, developed a station of officiating that was basically a teacher, but even then they did not dare to attest that this was a Priesthood position.

The reason I bring this to light is the point in fact that academically and theologically there must be some answer as to how Mohammad received the Priesthood to become a prophet of this new God Allah. This is likely why Mohammad chose Allah as the God of Islam. Allah has roots in ancient pagan worship and mythology but no roots in the House of Israel. Paradoxically, even the Quran points out he (Allah) had three daughters… Therefore, Mohammad's teachings of Allah diametrically oppose all the historical teachings that were considered factual doctrine for thousands of years by the House of Israel and Ishmael and again are the antithesis of Christ's teachings.

I am not aware of any ancient texts that the Islamist possess that will corroborate the assertion of Mohammad's ordination of the Melchizedek Priesthood. Even the Bible points out Christ's possession of this authority in Hebrews chapter's 5 and 7. But until then, this again begs the challenge to the authority of Mohammad’s position, as I asserted in my aforementioned first book "We the People: Whose Constitution is it Anyway - A Constitutional Fix to a Constitutional Problem."





B/R
G. R. Mobley
Original post ignored by Glenn Beck is here:
https://www.facebook.com/GlennBeck/posts/ [login to see] 023188
Maybe he ignored this because he did not include this info in his book “It IS about Islam.”