Avatar feed
Responses: 13
PO1 Don Gulizia
13
12
1
Because he's more educated than the masses that rely on WaPo click bait to learn their history? It's one thing to disagree with the current POTUS, but the left really have gone off the rails.
(13)
Comment
(1)
PFC Michael Korach
PFC Michael Korach
7 y
I suspect Kelly’s larger point was that Wilson had given a self-aggrandizing speech inappropriately at a memorial service. He may have been wrong about the question of Wilson taking credit for the building funding versus the name, but he certainly wasn't wrong about Wilson patting herself on the back in an inappropriate way.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
7 y
Maj John Bell - John, I've yet to see an Officer carry the load for any subordinate and certainly not any enlisted. I'm not questioning your claimed, I'm just questioning the reality of the situation. Just because I didn't want to hump a tripod, barrel, or body of a 50 Cal, someone is not going to carry anything. And like the old saying goes, "rank has it's privileges".
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Ray Stone
SSgt Ray Stone
7 y
Bottom line is Lee's a traitor and led poor dumb soldiers into war to uphold white supremacy. And what the hell does his education have to do with his comments. Book smarts doesn't equate to common sense.
(0)
Reply
(1)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
7 y
Cpl Tou Lee Yang - Rank also has its' responsibilities. If your story of the .50Cal is indicative of your esprit dé corps and your feeling of responsibility to your team, you'd have received corrective counseling from senior SNCO's. If it didn't take you'd be afforded the opportunity to try being a LCpl again.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Stan Hutchison
7
7
0
Another attempt to whitewash history and the Civil War. Regardless the attempt, the facts remain; The War was about Slavery!
Lee took up arms against the nation!
And, IMO, the South is still fighting that war.
(7)
Comment
(0)
CPO Gregory Smith
CPO Gregory Smith
7 y
I believe the states held a vote on secession in their individual legislatures so I’m not following your logic.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
My logic is the Constitution gives us the right to vote, but it does not give us the right to secede. This nation could not survive as 50 separate states. It must remain united (as much as possible) to survive as a nation. Anything else would evolve very quickly into utter chaos and the downfall of all states.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
7 y
MSG Stan Hutchison - Do you have a Constitutional basis for your belief that the States did not have a right to unilaterally secede? Because it has been an unresolved debate opened by both Northern and Southern States amongst ante-Bellum politicians until SCOTUS made a ruling in 1869 in Texas v White. Furthermore, SCOTUS left open the "legal" possibility of secession by a consensus of the States constituting the union.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
The issue of secession has been argued from the start of our nation. While I cannot point to a specific entry in the Constitution that prohibits secession, nor can you point to any that support it.
The Articles of Confederation speaks of "the perpetual Union" and the Preamble of the Constitution goes further; "a more perfect Union."
I my not-so-humble opinion, I believe our Founders did not support any division of this Nation, at least not enough to place the issue within the Constitution.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joseph Weber
4
4
0
The lack of compromise would be the souths insistence that half of all new states would be slave states. So I guess he is correct about that.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close