Posted on Jul 20, 2016
Kansas City Man's Anger At Law Enforcement Fit Into Sovereign Citizen Beliefs
2.58K
6
11
2
2
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
Was this guy also one of our veteran? Which leads me ask the question, was he under mental health treatment and if not why not?
(1)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
When I hear "Sovereign Citizen" or "OathKeeper" and several similar movement and organizations my ears perk up. I view them with the Same Disdain that I had for the IRA when I lived in London.
(1)
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel - I heard similar words said by Tim McVeigh as his defense, for killing all those civilian including children in Oklahoma City back in 95.
(0)
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel - Yet, they were service members at one time, so the question is how were they failed.
(0)
(0)
Amazing what type of the thinking is out there nowadays. I educate people on the Supreme Court's place: They are there to protect minority rights, not the majority. Take for instance the example of worshipping at the Church of the Squirrel. The symbol would be an acorn. Just because it is considered a fringe religion does not mean that the person(s) do not have rights.
(1)
(0)
SPC Michael Griggs
Sir, while the SCOTUS may frequently protect minority rights, that is not their role. Their role is to determine the constitutionality of laws. If people believe that SCOTUS will side with them just because they are a minority, they will surely be disappointed and even more disenfranchised with the government. Sometime the majority is indeed correct and will persevere in SCOTUS findings. However. the premise of "majority rules, minority rights" is what our Founding Fathers designed for us. I think the concept is eroding away as we see the government continually attacking our constitutional rights, whether it is the free speech, bearing arms, or in some case even the whole concept of due process.
That being said, I think the bigger point is that each community needs to have open conversations with each other. No pointing fingers, just honest talk and debate. At the end each needs to own their part of it and figure out how to work together to end it. For surely this is a case of our nation being divided. United we stand, divided we fall. Let us unite in open dialogue with open hearts to find a sense of commonality and common purpose.
That being said, I think the bigger point is that each community needs to have open conversations with each other. No pointing fingers, just honest talk and debate. At the end each needs to own their part of it and figure out how to work together to end it. For surely this is a case of our nation being divided. United we stand, divided we fall. Let us unite in open dialogue with open hearts to find a sense of commonality and common purpose.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next