LA Times editor says questioning Hillary's health is off-limits... because she's a woman

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/08/21/la-times-editor-says-questioning-hillarys-health-off-limits-shes-woman-381899?utm_source=BizPac+Review+Email+Newsletter&utm_campaign=8a70a48393-08_23_168_23_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fbf9323fb3-8a70a48 [login to see] 7
Ignore the headline. Ignore the source. This and many other articles like it lead us to believe that electing a woman as President is more important than electing anyone who is qualified, fit, willing, and able to serve. Even those who present themselves as opposed to Hillary as a candidate, are defending the notion that a woman should be President. Personally, I have no problems with the right woman being President. I simply don't believe Hillary is her. In fact, she could seriously set back the prospects of having the right woman elected if we are forced to suffer through a Hillary Clinton Administration. So, I asked women, and all agree with me. Now I'm asking on RP: Women - Are you determined to vote for a woman, any woman, regardless of all other factors? (Men, please let the women take this one) Sadly, the survey component hasn't been working for me.