Posted on Dec 7, 2016
Michigan Recount Now in Doubt; Pennsylvania Sets Hearing
2.8K
30
13
10
10
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 9
Blah Blah Blah they need to get over it. Aggressively looking to find ways to make this election invalid is pathetic.
(5)
(0)
That is good news SP5 Mark Kuzinski. Hopefully this waste of taxpayer dollars and government resources will be ended. It would be nice if Jill Stein and the Green party had to pay the bill for the cost of these massive recount of presidential ballots that she started with no credible evidence. Having her pay the bill would potentially dissuade others from a frivolous enterprise like this. SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL LTC Stephen C. Capt Seid Waddell CW5 (Join to see) SFC William Farrell SSgt (Join to see) SGT (Join to see) SGT Forrest Stewart SPC (Join to see) Maj William W. "Bill" Price Capt Tom Brown SMSgt Minister Gerald A. Thomas SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4"SSgt Robert Marx TSgt Joe C. SGT Robert George PO2 Ed C.
(3)
(0)
SP5 Mark Kuzinski I grew up watching AFaRTS service spots. They always had spots on for the fraud waste and abuse hotline. It was designed so that wasteful use of military resources could be reported anonymously. I don't know if it still exists, but if it does, and they want something to use as an example, this would be it. IF the vote in these states was close enough, it would have triggered an automatic recount. The results were not that close. In Nevada it is even more retarded. HRC won by almost 30,000 votes. The recount there is aimed at getting her a wider margin of victory. It does not matter (under our current EC System) whether a candidate carries the state by one vote or a million votes, they get the same number of Electoral votes for the state. Increasing the margin of victory is meaningless. This whole thing is a debacle. Though I do find it humorous that Michigan is telling Stein, "Sorry, you sucked ass in the election; therefore, you don't get to ask for a recount."
(2)
(0)
Read This Next