Posted on Dec 18, 2016
Military judge bars Bergdahl prosecutors from using wounds at trial
1.61K
7
9
1
1
0
This is a BS move in the Bergdhal case. Read why.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. — Prosecutors were rebuffed from harnessing the most contentious issue surrounding the court martial of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl when a judge ruled out any evidence that soldiers were wounded while searching for him.
FORT BRAGG, N.C. — Prosecutors were rebuffed from harnessing the most contentious issue surrounding the court martial of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl when a judge ruled out any evidence that soldiers were wounded while searching for him.
Military judge bars Bergdahl prosecutors from using wounds at trial
Posted from armytimes.com
Bergdahl
Court Martial
Desertion
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 4
2
2
0
No pardon. This guy should should face charges for going over the wall, but the murder of those killed looking for him and any injuries of any soldiers looking for his sorry was....
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I keep hearing different stories about whether anyone looking for him was killed, injured, or none of that. So, I don't know about that but his sorry ass needs to be in prison for desertion and not following orders.
(0)
(0)
SFC Carlos Cruz
SGT Keith Bodine, six Soldiers where kill during the search: https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/time/2809352/bowe-bergdahl-deserter-army-taliban
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
1
1
0
Playing devil's advocate here. Is the prosecution's case strong enough without this "emotional argument?" If so, they don't need it. If not, they're already fighting a losing battle.
However, quoted from the article:
"One of the prosecutors, Army Maj. Justin Oshana, told the judge Friday that military jurors, compared to civilians, are "much less likely to be susceptible to unfair prejudice.""
I leave that direct quote for consumption and I call BS. I'm sorry, but Maj. Oshana needs to report for a urinalysis right now if he believes that or was able to say that with a straight face. If he passes it, he needs to go in for a psych-eval because he obviously has never served with anyone in our military or has had blinders on the entire time.
However, quoted from the article:
"One of the prosecutors, Army Maj. Justin Oshana, told the judge Friday that military jurors, compared to civilians, are "much less likely to be susceptible to unfair prejudice.""
I leave that direct quote for consumption and I call BS. I'm sorry, but Maj. Oshana needs to report for a urinalysis right now if he believes that or was able to say that with a straight face. If he passes it, he needs to go in for a psych-eval because he obviously has never served with anyone in our military or has had blinders on the entire time.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google