Avatar feed
Responses: 1
SN Greg Wright
1
1
0
I have no problem with this. Those commanders fostered an atmosphere wherein it was ok to send ships and crews to sea without the proper certifications. I agree wholeheartedly that the watchstanders, right down to the lowly lookouts, are accountable, but I have zero problems replacing people who allowed the situation to develop like it did.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
7 y
SCPO (Join to see) - "More than a third of warfare training certifications for the Navy's Japan-based destroyers and cruisers had expired in June -- a five-fold increase from two years prior, the Government Accountability Office has found."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/06/politics/concerns-safety-us-navy-pacific-fleet/index.html
(0)
Reply
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
7 y
SCPO (Join to see) - Could go on all day, Senior, it's been all over the net.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SCPO Investigator
SCPO (Join to see)
7 y
I can see where this information would paint such a inferred picture as you stated. However, as to one point made, that certifications had expired, and that some how means something, I say that once you're taught to ride a bike you do not forget.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
7 y
SCPO (Join to see) - I don't disagree (although I'd point out that the Navy closed the ship-handling school that teaches officers how to drive ships in 2006, and somewhere around there stopped requiring them to know how to navigate by the stars, so it's a big question of whether or not they ever LEARNED to ride the bike,) Senior, but NavRegs say 'ship xxx needs xxxx certifications before deployment', and command, all up and down the chain, chose to bypass that. I don't see how that can be excused.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close