Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
1
1
0
That was specific to the Benghazi investigation, not an impeachment.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
5 y
No it's not...
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rules-impeachment-now-analysis/story?id=66689552
I don't care if it's Trump or any other President. Follow the precedent with regards to previous impeachments.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
5 y
Sorry but your article speaks nothing of the lawyers able to be present. No, it’s not.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
0
0
0
He also has himself for all the accusations he is receiving.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
0
0
0
67 Senators.
Thanks, James Madison!
(0)
Comment
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
5 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - #thingsthatwillnothappen
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
5 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - It hasn't happened yet...
But I would say that it is much more probable now than it was then.
But I will go to the mat knowing that there is no way the Senate Majority Leader lets a secret vote happen. That is almost unheard of in the Senate.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close