Posted on Oct 12, 2016
Publius Huldah Powerful Speech: All Federal Gun Control Is Unlawful
3.29K
13
16
4
4
0
All Federal Gun Control Is Unlawful
Publius Huldah is a retired litigation attorney who now lives in Tennessee. Before getting a law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge).
She now writes extensively on the U.S. Constitution, using the Federalist Papers to prove its original meaning and intent. She shows how federal judges and politicians have ignored Our Constitution and replaced it with their personal opinions and beliefs. She also shows how The People can, by learning our Founding Principles themselves, restore our Constitutional Republic.
More from Publius Huldah here: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/huldah
Publius Huldah is a retired litigation attorney who now lives in Tennessee. Before getting a law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge).
She now writes extensively on the U.S. Constitution, using the Federalist Papers to prove its original meaning and intent. She shows how federal judges and politicians have ignored Our Constitution and replaced it with their personal opinions and beliefs. She also shows how The People can, by learning our Founding Principles themselves, restore our Constitutional Republic.
More from Publius Huldah here: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/huldah
Constitution
Gun Control
Rights
Freedom
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 6
1
1
0
The Federalist Papers are NOT controlling documents or even law. They are irrelevant.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
When interpreting the language of older documents, like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights don't you think that periodicals and writings from the times help understand the meanings of the words at that time?
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - They help understand the conditions, but often only confuse the final result.
The Constitution created our system of government, and it created the amendment process to change the document itself, and within the Supreme Court it created the mechanism to interpret the constitution and how it applies to future issues.
So called "Constitutional Sheriffs" and fringe groups like the "Oathkeepers" latch onto whatever theories they can find to argue that the federal government cannot do this or that, but to me they are just that, fringe groups, what we used to call the crazy tent, and those arguments do not hold any water with me.
The Constitution created our system of government, and it created the amendment process to change the document itself, and within the Supreme Court it created the mechanism to interpret the constitution and how it applies to future issues.
So called "Constitutional Sheriffs" and fringe groups like the "Oathkeepers" latch onto whatever theories they can find to argue that the federal government cannot do this or that, but to me they are just that, fringe groups, what we used to call the crazy tent, and those arguments do not hold any water with me.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
LTC (Join to see)
SFC George Smith The Oathkeepers have been pushing Constitutional Law for quite awhile now. There are some county Sheriffs that are really behind it.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
The Federalist Papers don't prove anything, or they'd be the law of the land. But gosh darn it they're gonna take your guns away!!
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSG Drew Cook I would agree that in and of themselves the Federalist Papers don't prove anything, but wouldn't you agree that they (the Federalist Papers) do provide some clarity to the thoughts behind both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google