Posted on Jun 14, 2019
Rep. Louie Gohmert: "Until Border Is Secure, it's Ridiculous to Discuss DACA, Dreamers, &...
664
11
10
4
4
0
Rep. Louie Gohmert: "Until Border Is Secure, it's Ridiculous to Discuss DACA, Dreamers, & Amnesty"
Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) talks with Judicial Watch about the crisis going on at the southern border. He says, "Until the border is secure, it is ridiculous to talk about DACA, dreamers, amnesty, legal status, etc. You secure the border then we can work something out about people that are here, but once people see that they aren’t going to be released for 4 years on their own, they stop coming.
Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) talks with Judicial Watch about the crisis going on at the southern border. He says, "Until the border is secure, it is ridiculous to talk about DACA, dreamers, amnesty, legal status, etc. You secure the border then we can work something out about people that are here, but once people see that they aren’t going to be released for 4 years on their own, they stop coming.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
National Security
Immigration
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
2
2
0
Gohmert is a good Rep., but can’t do anything but shine the light on Pelosi and her nuts. The thing stopping them is the Senate and Presidential VETO.
(2)
(0)
SGT James Murphy
I do like Mr. Gohmert. I wish that they were able to do more than talk to the situation... We give them the power and they f^(# it up.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Who’d have thought a GOP president threatening to close the border, ban people from specific countries, and cutting off humanitarian aid would lead to a migrant implosion after achieving the lowest level of border crossings in 2016.
The Deporter in Chief with his reputation of doing what he had to do with unaccompanied minors but still led the way in deportations avoided encouraging mass migration with anti-immigration threats. Just saying.
The Deporter in Chief with his reputation of doing what he had to do with unaccompanied minors but still led the way in deportations avoided encouraging mass migration with anti-immigration threats. Just saying.
(1)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
CPT Gregory Hafera Loyalty does mean something and so did common sense and rational thought. Which makes me question your whole comment. How do you calmly igmore a fact and observation that illegal immigration was already at a low point in 2016 before the crazy anti-immigration rhetoric of 2017? How do you ignore the policies of threats and intimidation has done nothing but exacerbated the problem.
As for loyalty, I’m not the one telling the world I’ll gladly take illegal information from foreign agents for political gain. We’re talking immigration and you bring up ISIS and Al Qaeda. Well since you want to talk Sunni and Shi’a relationships perhaps the US should stop siding with the Sunni supporting Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia and radical Zionists in their proxy wars with the Shi’a. Let them fight their own wars. “The enemy of our enemy” concept is BS in today’s world especially when we align ourselves with radicals to defeat radicals.
Come back when you’re ready to talk rationally. But don’t ever question my loyalty when I believe our government should be treating illegal migrants with human dignity and not undesirable animals.
As for loyalty, I’m not the one telling the world I’ll gladly take illegal information from foreign agents for political gain. We’re talking immigration and you bring up ISIS and Al Qaeda. Well since you want to talk Sunni and Shi’a relationships perhaps the US should stop siding with the Sunni supporting Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia and radical Zionists in their proxy wars with the Shi’a. Let them fight their own wars. “The enemy of our enemy” concept is BS in today’s world especially when we align ourselves with radicals to defeat radicals.
Come back when you’re ready to talk rationally. But don’t ever question my loyalty when I believe our government should be treating illegal migrants with human dignity and not undesirable animals.
(0)
(0)
MAJ James Woods
CPT Gregory Hafera Ok. Lets try this again. I wrote all this stuff and the mobile site app only posted my first sentence.
Ok you got me 1. When did I advocate for the overthrow of the US government? 2. When did I say I was fine with the current state of immigration today. 3. Do you really think tech giants are only silencing one side of criticism of immigration?
Every administration going back to Reagan has had to deal with a surge of either refugees or illegal migrants. The difference is they didn’t use it as partisan politics and further exacerbated the situation with absurd partisan rhetoric, threats against other countries or the denial of humanitarian aid.
It isn’t unAmerican to criticize the way the government treats migrants in detention. It isn’t racist to advocate the deportation of illegals that fail to obtain asylum, refugee, or residency status. I can guarantee social media sites are blocking or demonetizing folks on both sides of the debate and will continue to do so in order to protect their profit margins with sponsors.
So I’ll ask again; when and where did I commit public sedition and advocated for the overthrow of our government? Are you opening my comments and seeing words that aren’t there? Get some reading glasses then.
Fox News and similar right wing media outlets are garbage. MSNBC and CNN are biased but don’t push outright lies. Stick to POTUS radio, NPR, and BBC if you want both sides honestly debated on the same outlet. First loyalty and now sedition; don’t accuse me of unsubstantiated allegations again.
Ok you got me 1. When did I advocate for the overthrow of the US government? 2. When did I say I was fine with the current state of immigration today. 3. Do you really think tech giants are only silencing one side of criticism of immigration?
Every administration going back to Reagan has had to deal with a surge of either refugees or illegal migrants. The difference is they didn’t use it as partisan politics and further exacerbated the situation with absurd partisan rhetoric, threats against other countries or the denial of humanitarian aid.
It isn’t unAmerican to criticize the way the government treats migrants in detention. It isn’t racist to advocate the deportation of illegals that fail to obtain asylum, refugee, or residency status. I can guarantee social media sites are blocking or demonetizing folks on both sides of the debate and will continue to do so in order to protect their profit margins with sponsors.
So I’ll ask again; when and where did I commit public sedition and advocated for the overthrow of our government? Are you opening my comments and seeing words that aren’t there? Get some reading glasses then.
Fox News and similar right wing media outlets are garbage. MSNBC and CNN are biased but don’t push outright lies. Stick to POTUS radio, NPR, and BBC if you want both sides honestly debated on the same outlet. First loyalty and now sedition; don’t accuse me of unsubstantiated allegations again.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google