Rules For Cyberwarfare Still Unclear, Even As U.S. Engages In It

Fight fire with fire but, no life shall be forfeit and no life be stolen.

my feelings on this are the same as with cyber crime. if it mimics breaking rules used for physical actions, it is wrong.

- if you entered their file system without permission, you broke in
- if you hack a hospital, it is not war but terror
- if you shutdown a city it better have a significant tactical reason and be justified properly

cyber attacks can have causalities too, we should use the same judgement to justify their use. warfare is not different, the domain is.

Cyber warfare rules? That's why America is so lacking. They don't even understand what the hell they're fighting. We're less qualified to be talking cyber warfare than a country like the Isle of Man has in fighting an actual way.

Spent 2.5 years in the industry back when it was the Wild West. 2010-2012. I was dam good at the job but lost two jobs because I was an immigrant and unable to meet security standards. The government requires the same hiring protocol or "standards" they keep for other types of jobs but fail to realize the dam best in the buisness won't work for them because a) there is way more money in remaining private and b) way more freedom.

Old technological handicaps at the top still see "hackers" as a comical mid 90s movie character and don't even get that the only reason our nations infrastructure hasn't been compromised is not because we're so dam good but because no one has cared to have a go at it while bored.