Posted on Jun 17, 2021
Scientist Backing Probe Into Wuhan Lab: We Waited Because We Didn’t Want ‘To Be Associated With...
152
4
2
2
2
0
"At the time, it was scarier to be associated with Trump and to become a tool for racists, so people didn't want to publicly call for an investigation into lab origins," Alina Chan said.
"Now, more scientists are comfortable confronting the gamut of plausible theories — particularly given China's opacity about the topic — although many still caution that entertaining the idea of a lab leak requires clear scientific proof, which hasn't materialized."
"Now, more scientists are comfortable confronting the gamut of plausible theories — particularly given China's opacity about the topic — although many still caution that entertaining the idea of a lab leak requires clear scientific proof, which hasn't materialized."
Scientist Backing Probe Into Wuhan Lab: We Waited Because We Didn’t Want ‘To Be Associated With...
Posted from dailywire.comPosted in these groups: 
Broadcast Media
Broadcast Media
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
1
1
0
We waited because even we do not believe in the scientific approach. Doing the RIGHT thing does not garner our funding!
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
Even before the china virus, some in the scientific community were trying to tell us that scientific studies may not be valid. The rush to first publication of a study/research has created laziness. A lot of scientists won't even peer review a study because they don't want their own studies scrutinized. Then those studies break into the political realm.
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, says Ioannidis, with ensuing confusion and disappointment.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google