Responses: 4
"Every day, immigration officials must determine whether
to admit or remove the many aliens who have arrived at
an official “port of entry” (e.g., an international airport or
border crossing) or who have been apprehended trying to
enter the country at an unauthorized location. Immigration
officials must also determine on a daily basis whether
there are grounds for removing any of the aliens who are
already present inside the country. The vast majority of
these determinations are quickly made, but in some cases
deciding whether an alien should be admitted or removed
is not as easy. As a result, Congress has authorized immigration
officials to detain some classes of aliens during the
course of certain immigration proceedings. Detention
during those proceedings gives immigration officials time
to determine an alien’s status without running the risk of
the alien’s either absconding or engaging in criminal activity before a final decision can be made."
Straight from the ruling, anything else just seems like hysteria.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1204_f29g.pdf
Please excuse the cancerous looking text, it's a pdf I swear.......
to admit or remove the many aliens who have arrived at
an official “port of entry” (e.g., an international airport or
border crossing) or who have been apprehended trying to
enter the country at an unauthorized location. Immigration
officials must also determine on a daily basis whether
there are grounds for removing any of the aliens who are
already present inside the country. The vast majority of
these determinations are quickly made, but in some cases
deciding whether an alien should be admitted or removed
is not as easy. As a result, Congress has authorized immigration
officials to detain some classes of aliens during the
course of certain immigration proceedings. Detention
during those proceedings gives immigration officials time
to determine an alien’s status without running the risk of
the alien’s either absconding or engaging in criminal activity before a final decision can be made."
Straight from the ruling, anything else just seems like hysteria.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1204_f29g.pdf
Please excuse the cancerous looking text, it's a pdf I swear.......
fbr6íØ.&;û\¡qÓµÍ\-%sëssÎÝ^ÞÍe&fgo\mN/ïæîg1ßÞÜy LãÝÜfÁÀÑÁÀÑÀØÁ ÑÀÑ $À 0@X )ô #kè+u00 b! Ì `µpDUËÄfÂ0I/9@6È!P w40([ [PC?Å1òúË)pÑÏÀÏ`Àq-¡@¡Þa{ãuæ]lüoM``f``VaÑy ÀØÂÐÊÀ'â-u0î-úø8«â1 -ÉÀ0C,ÎzH=f`=QÆ(` endstream endobj 2700 0 obj /Metadata 225 0 R/PageLabels 2676 0 R/Pages 2678 0 R/StructTreeRoot 263 0 R/Type/Catalog endobj 2701 0 obj /Font/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page endobj 2702 0 obj stream hÞUmOÛ0þ+þ84øÝÚBaÒÊéÆ$Ä...
(1)
(0)
Read This Next