2
2
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 3
I very seriously looked at the paper on !metabolic profiling, as well as the text on deamidation. I don't necessarily agree with so!e of the !material!!emtiomed, however, the clinical and/ biochemical material certainly seems quite solid in basis.
(1)
(0)
Thank you SCPO Donnie Bowerman for a great read. A few of things, the tobacco promoters that OKed cigerrets were main stream scientist at that point. There were not a lot academics linking cigarettes with cancer etc. The Wright Brothers were in competition with a well funded politically connected fellow. The Wright Brothers recognized that the lift tables created by German scientists were wrong and conducted experiments that allowed them to correct the tables. They beat out the other guy. I can't think of his name but I will look it up. He is a Princeton scientist who worked with Einstein. He says warming isn't bad, more people die of cold than heat. Very fun read. Dr Dyson is who I was trying to think of. http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2013/04/climatologists_are_no_einstein.html
Climatologists are no Einsteins, says his successor
Freeman Dyson may be the most accomplished physicist not just in New Jersey but on the planet - too smart to accept simplistic explanations of climate change
(1)
(0)
Read This Next