Posted on Jul 6, 2019
The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed
561
30
7
7
7
0
The Left is in a desperate battle (as evinced in this article) to preserve the Administrative Government (The Swamp) in which "the best people" govern the rest of us. The Administrative Government depends on Congress delegating its legislative power to bureaucrats (those better than the rest of us). We need to fight just as desperately to preserve the nondelegation doctrine, the principle that the Congress of the United States, being vested with "all legislative powers" by Article One, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, cannot delegate that power to anyone else, otherwise government of the people, by the people, and for the people will perish and our betters will continue to erode our individual rights
The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed
Posted from newyorker.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Constitution
Supreme Court Constitution
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
6
6
0
I agree with you 100% CPT Jack Durish!!! If we don't take a stand and fight back, we are doomed to be ruled and our rights will diminish one by one until they are totally erased... That is why it is imperative that the (Political) Conservatives push as equally hard to overcome this evolving political turmoil as is our current Commander in Chief and President of these United States of America!!! Great Post, my friend!!!
(6)
(0)
SSgt Terry P.
Sgt (Join to see) Our rights have been diminishing one at a time for years,Sgt,a few people have begun to notice in the last few years.
A good example is the ban on smoking---Smoking is bad for your health and those around you,but for a business owner to decide if he allowed smoking in his establishment was removed by laws instead of his own decision and the choice of an individual to enter a smoking atmosphere or not was replaced by law.Same with seat belt laws.These may be for the protection of the individual,but the decision of an Adult should be his own unless he intrudes on another.Entering an establishment where smoking is allowed should be a choice of the individual or wearing a seat belt should be the choice of the individual since it only effects that person's health or welfare.If you want to eat a restaurant and the guy next table over is smoking,don't frequent that restaurant.If i don't want to wear a seat belt,i am an adult and it harms no one else,there should be no "law" forcing me to do so or being fined if i do not.
Not advocating smoking or not wearing seat belts,just pointing out the sneaking in of controlling the population.
A good example is the ban on smoking---Smoking is bad for your health and those around you,but for a business owner to decide if he allowed smoking in his establishment was removed by laws instead of his own decision and the choice of an individual to enter a smoking atmosphere or not was replaced by law.Same with seat belt laws.These may be for the protection of the individual,but the decision of an Adult should be his own unless he intrudes on another.Entering an establishment where smoking is allowed should be a choice of the individual or wearing a seat belt should be the choice of the individual since it only effects that person's health or welfare.If you want to eat a restaurant and the guy next table over is smoking,don't frequent that restaurant.If i don't want to wear a seat belt,i am an adult and it harms no one else,there should be no "law" forcing me to do so or being fined if i do not.
Not advocating smoking or not wearing seat belts,just pointing out the sneaking in of controlling the population.
(4)
(0)
Sgt (Join to see)
SSgt Terry P. - I couldn't agree more, but I did not want to delve into all the rights that have already been taken from us... I am in hopes that the people will wake up and see for themselves what is going on... However, the people who have been already brainwashed is another story in itself...
(4)
(0)
5
5
0
Mark Levin, "Men in Black"
There needs to be term limits in the SCOTUS also! Judges do not have legislative authority, congress does by the document they swore fealty to when they donned the robe.
There needs to be term limits in the SCOTUS also! Judges do not have legislative authority, congress does by the document they swore fealty to when they donned the robe.
(5)
(0)
4
4
0
CPT Jack Durish This is what our founding fathers were afraid of. I agree with you wholeheartedly that we the people have let this go on for far too long. The challenge we're facing is a political party hellbent on seeing our Republic collapse. They've done a good job at placing that wedge between us and they continue pounding on it every chance they get. Their followers do not know any better and they continue following and believing the rhetoric spewing out of their mouths. They continue re-writing history because it largely doesn't fit their narratives/agenda and before too long, we aren't going to now why WWII was fought. Something has to radically change in DC.
(4)
(0)
Oofy Prosser
You are right, it is about time we did something to stop the Republican Party. They are trying to destroy the foundations of our democracy by debasing our intelligence services, scorn our veterans, denigrate the press. They refuse to let Pres. Trump present the health-care-for-all-at-lower-prices plan he promised. He promised "only the best" people would join his government but the Republicans only confirm the worst. All they have let him do is pass one piece of legislation that benefited a small number of Americans. He should run for President as a Democrat next year!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google