2
2
0
Yes Chumpsters, THIS piece of trash is YOUR CANDIDATE.
The Trump Possibility
Posted from nytimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Donald Trump
Election 2016
Donald Trump Election 2016
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 7
3
3
0
"Chumpsters" is that what I am because I support him? How old are you? This sounds like 8th grade playground talk, not something I would expect from a fellow service member on a military themed and focused forum... Its cool to voice your opinion for your candidate, but to call folks chumps that dont agree with you is not going to win the hearts and minds with persuasion.
(3)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
PO1 Steve Eckhouse - Plase do. Anyone who can support such a disgusting troglodyte as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is not worth the effort.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
That you support such a disgrace to the presidency means logical argument won't work. Just like the old saying "you are what you eat", well I can't imagine how someone who isn't a bigot, a misogynist, or a juvenile bully can possibly consider voting for one as president.
Trump is a symptom of the dumbing down of America, and his supporters are the problem. If that is you, then we have nothing to talk about.
Have a nice life.
Trump is a symptom of the dumbing down of America, and his supporters are the problem. If that is you, then we have nothing to talk about.
Have a nice life.
(0)
(0)
CSM Michael Chavaree
Wow I guess I have been blocked... I thought I was a brother in arms? I am sorry our dissagreement for presidential candidate is a stronger bond than that one shared between service.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
While trump was not my favorite and yes he is what he is( i beive the article covered most of it)
But how could we as military, even think about voting for hrc
But how could we as military, even think about voting for hrc
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
MSgt Keith Hebert - Nice right wing talking points, but nowhere near the level of Trump's incompetence. Twitter slut shaming at 3:00 AM? How is that presidential?
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Because unlike Trump, her ego isn't so fragile that she will start a Twitter, or nuclear war over an insult.
Oh, but s'more than the generals about how to defeat ISIS because he listens to himself with his very good brain.
Give me a break. He's an immature bully and nothing more.
Oh, but s'more than the generals about how to defeat ISIS because he listens to himself with his very good brain.
Give me a break. He's an immature bully and nothing more.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Keith Hebert
LTC (Join to see) - I agree with everything you say. When I watched the Benghazi hearings, all I heard was that other people not me was responsible.
Her responses to all the email crap, which come down to I did not know.
Bullshit if you are in government for thirty years you know about classifications.
And let's talk about leadership, if you are in charge then you are responsible for all that goes right and all that goes wrong, end of story. When a leader refuses to take responsibility for their actions or inactions and try's to blame them on others is not a leader but a resin that will stab you in the back and then convince everybody that you fell backwards on that knife.
Her responses to all the email crap, which come down to I did not know.
Bullshit if you are in government for thirty years you know about classifications.
And let's talk about leadership, if you are in charge then you are responsible for all that goes right and all that goes wrong, end of story. When a leader refuses to take responsibility for their actions or inactions and try's to blame them on others is not a leader but a resin that will stab you in the back and then convince everybody that you fell backwards on that knife.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
MSgt Keith Hebert - I agree with you on the email, and it was a big mistake for her. Benghazi had only three responsible parties. The terrorists get 99% of the blame, with the other 1% split between Ambassador Stevens himself for taking unnecessary risks, and the GOP house for cutting the. Diplomatic security budget.
The GOP knew Hillary would run, and then they knew the only possible way they could beat her was if she had a scandal big enough to cancel her qualifications. Email came close, Benghazi was and remains a stain on the GOP for trying to politicize a national tragedy for partisan purposes (imagine if the Democrats had done that to Bush with 9/11 and you get the idea who shitty this looked to non GOP partisans). Fortunately for the Democrats and unfortunately for Republicans, the email scandal is not enough because you chose to nominate the absolute worst candidate in American history, a man so vile and disgusting that even in his own party, everyone who puts country before party has turned against him. Simply, Trump is a much bigger "scandal" than Hillary's email, which is the only valid (as in, non Swift Boat) scandal the GOP has against an otherwise very knowledgeable, experienced and well-rounded candidate.
The GOP knew Hillary would run, and then they knew the only possible way they could beat her was if she had a scandal big enough to cancel her qualifications. Email came close, Benghazi was and remains a stain on the GOP for trying to politicize a national tragedy for partisan purposes (imagine if the Democrats had done that to Bush with 9/11 and you get the idea who shitty this looked to non GOP partisans). Fortunately for the Democrats and unfortunately for Republicans, the email scandal is not enough because you chose to nominate the absolute worst candidate in American history, a man so vile and disgusting that even in his own party, everyone who puts country before party has turned against him. Simply, Trump is a much bigger "scandal" than Hillary's email, which is the only valid (as in, non Swift Boat) scandal the GOP has against an otherwise very knowledgeable, experienced and well-rounded candidate.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google