Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
2
2
0
MAJ Patrick Ross where is the common sense at? IMHO, its not the Soldiers faults!
Investigations have determined that lack of oversight allowed for widespread fraud and mismanagement by California Guard officials under pressure to meet enlistment targets.
(2)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
LTC Stephen B.
8 y
Guard recruiting officials were prosecuted for fraud. Unfortunately, the Law is the Law. If you read the full LA Times article you will see that CA Guard is assisting with requests for waivers of indebtedness and recommending a favorable decision.

What is disheartening is that it came out today that the CA Congressional Delegation was informed two tears ago and asked for assistance in modifying statute to allow the Guard to waive the debt (currently only the Army can do so) but no action was taken.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-bonus-guard-20161024-snap-story.html?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Early%20Bird%20Brief%2010.25.2016&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Military%20-%20Early%20Bird%20Brief
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Patrick Ross
MAJ Patrick Ross
8 y
LTC Stephen B. - Agree with part. But this should have been a better response. I am glad it is getting attention. For the handful that knew or took advantage, shame. But for the majority that do what they are told wrt finance, especially in the Reserve component, they wouldn't know, nor take the time to investigate - the expert told them. Legal should have done a better job. Cases were at the ABCMR and I found one reference to a class action lawsuit. Shifting the burden to the Soldier after the files were shredded was also inappropriate. The burden should have been to pull a group of legal folks onto AD and actually go through records, request records from the Soldiers, and assist in making it right. The CA Guard spent how much on advertising faux patriotism events? http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/11/14-nfl-teams-took-tax-dollars-for-patriotic-pregame-displays/ I did see the CA Guard tried to do somethings to help, so for that grateful.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Smith
0
0
0
this should be a class action suit...
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Patrick Ross
MAJ Patrick Ross
8 y
Doing more research, found that there appears to be one filed. Still researching. This actually initially become public in 2013. Just first I had heard.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
LTC Stephen B.
8 y
MAJ Patrick Ross - Yes, and the Soldier that started the class-action reportedly had his debt waived and then the government asked to have the class action dismissed since the primary no longer had standing. That was in a second LA Times article.

There have already been some waived by Army so far, unfortunately that is a small office and the process is built for caution and completeness, not for speed. Dumping nearly 10,000 cases into this bottle-neck will result in long resolution timelines.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
LTC Stephen B.
8 y
MAJ Patrick Ross - Also, Congress, via the CA Guard to the CA delegation, was notified two years ago of this issue and the CA Guard proposed a solution. Appears the CA Congressional Delegation did nothing with that. Link to the article in a previous comment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Patrick Ross
MAJ Patrick Ross
8 y
LTC Stephen B. - Seems you know a lot more on the topic than I do. Thank you for the information and updating. I don't think that anyone in uniform deliberately tries to screw over each other, not our ethics.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close