Posted on Oct 31, 2018
Trump's birthright plan vs. the U.S. Constitution: Here's who wins
2.59K
65
32
5
5
0
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 11
Very eye opening..while I am not against legal immigration, children born of illegal aliens are also illegal..remove the anchor baby inventive..
(7)
(0)
It clearly was not. It was put there for emancipated slaves who had been denied citizenship. It was properly expanded to cover Native Americans who were members of their tribes but also subject to US law.
(7)
(0)
PO1 John Johnson
SFC Pete Kain - The 2nd amendment is to protect us from foreign invasion AND to overthrow a tyrannical Government of the US, should one arise. Plain and simple!
(2)
(0)
SFC Pete Kain
PO1 John Johnson - I know that, muskets and flintlocks was a pretty dumb comment made earlier
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney - I will partially agree with your musket and flintlock statement on one basis. At the time it was written the available weapons were muskets and flintlock rifles, But that is not what is used by the government today. The people have a right to be able to adequately defend themselves against the government.
(1)
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
SGT Anna Kleinschmidt - I did not say it covered Native Americans at the time but that it was expanded later on to cover them.
(0)
(0)
Birthright Citizenship in the United States
Advocates of maintaining this citizenship policy argue that the plain language of the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment protects automatic birthright citizenship for all children born to illegal and temporary aliens.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next