Posted on Jan 8, 2024
UNABASHED AND INGRAINED FRAUD AT FORT CARSON ARMY FACILITY – CONGRESS DOESN’T CARE AND TAXPAYERS...
2.35K
5
32
0
0
0
Link to Military Corruption.com article detailing how Fort Carson embezzles and covers up its embezzlement of tax dollars.
UNABASHED AND INGRAINED FRAUD AT FORT CARSON ARMY FACILITY – CONGRESS DOESN’T CARE AND TAXPAYERS...
Posted from militarycorruption.comPosted in these groups: 
Fort Carson
Fort Carson
Posted 11 mo ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Well I'm going to jump in here and say yes the article reads like conspiracy theories but is more like than not true. As a former soldier and civilian employee who worked in finance this would have been a conflict of interest hiring one of your employees to do work for your organization under contract.
Unfortunately the amount of money was probably budget dust. I would highly suggest you read some cases that OMB has prused nobody goes to jail they retire or get reassigned. Corruption is everywhere.
Unfortunately the amount of money was probably budget dust. I would highly suggest you read some cases that OMB has prused nobody goes to jail they retire or get reassigned. Corruption is everywhere.
(1)
(0)
SGT Ronald Coyle, Ph.D.
Actually, I worked in the marketing department of MWR as a civilian. I was a GS employee working for a NAF agency.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
1) Fort Carson does not embezzle. Fort Carson CANNOT embezzle. Fort Carson is a place, and places cannot act. PEOPLE at Fort Carson (may be) embezzl(ing).
2) This article is so circuitously and vaguely worded that it approaches incomprehensibility. This is 100% written like a conspiracy theory - long on insinuation and *hints* of wrong doing and short on actual facts. Add in the repeated "*they* don't want you to know"s and the "if the public knew what was really going on"s and the occasional "the only people who refuse my wild-ass accusations are people who don't care or people who are complicit"s and you got an article that is a completely waste of time and electrons.
2) This article is so circuitously and vaguely worded that it approaches incomprehensibility. This is 100% written like a conspiracy theory - long on insinuation and *hints* of wrong doing and short on actual facts. Add in the repeated "*they* don't want you to know"s and the "if the public knew what was really going on"s and the occasional "the only people who refuse my wild-ass accusations are people who don't care or people who are complicit"s and you got an article that is a completely waste of time and electrons.
(1)
(0)
SGT Ronald Coyle, Ph.D.
SFC Casey O'Mally - Also, who owned the civilian blog where purchases went to. It was a Ryan Stikeleather. That's what the purchase receipts show. Why exactly did the Army write up a vague report? It certainly could've been more specific. Furthermore, why do I have audio of an Army CID agent saying I was on a 'Need to Know' basis where the base says I was supposedly funneling money...to MWR employees accounts.
Yeah...I'm the grifter.
Yeah...I'm the grifter.
(0)
(0)
SGT Ronald Coyle, Ph.D.
SFC Casey O'Mally - Also, MWR agreed to a formal investigation in writing prior to questioning me - yet excluded every piece of evidence I had at the time - included some evidence with projects my managers actually asked me to do - - including the person who wrote the investigation - - and the investigation is 'informal'.
Sounds like the grifters needed a fall guy and I caught on. Upon gathering enough evidence, I brought up the matter. I was subsequently investigated but never charged. Investigation results were withheld from until I was able to get them begrudgingly through a FOIA request. The remainder of the results are heavily redacted despite a report that blames me for something - - and in which a Garrison Commander says I did no impropriety to Congressman Doug Lamborn - - in writing - - yet you disagree with.
I'll post the letter to Doug Lamborn.
Sounds like the grifters needed a fall guy and I caught on. Upon gathering enough evidence, I brought up the matter. I was subsequently investigated but never charged. Investigation results were withheld from until I was able to get them begrudgingly through a FOIA request. The remainder of the results are heavily redacted despite a report that blames me for something - - and in which a Garrison Commander says I did no impropriety to Congressman Doug Lamborn - - in writing - - yet you disagree with.
I'll post the letter to Doug Lamborn.
(0)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SGT Ronald Coyle, Ph.D. When I said I was done, I meant I was done.
When I asked you to stop spamming me, I meant stop spamming me.
Having been involved in multiple different investigations from almost every angle - accused, accuser, whistle-blower, witness, and investigator - I can think of many different possible answers to your inane "How come......" questions. But I was not there, and I was not part of the investigation, so obviously I cannot answer specifically.
You posted a straight up conspiracy theory. Then when called on it, you got aggressive but still failed to provide any evidence. Then when called on THAT, you started posting select evidence - just enough to shape the narrative you wanted; kind of like the edited J6 footage (and you can choose the Congressional edit or the Tucker edit - either way it is selectively edited to shape a narrative, not to show the truth.)
I stand by my assessments, and they will not change.
So PLEASE just drop it. Or at least go whine to someone else.
When I asked you to stop spamming me, I meant stop spamming me.
Having been involved in multiple different investigations from almost every angle - accused, accuser, whistle-blower, witness, and investigator - I can think of many different possible answers to your inane "How come......" questions. But I was not there, and I was not part of the investigation, so obviously I cannot answer specifically.
You posted a straight up conspiracy theory. Then when called on it, you got aggressive but still failed to provide any evidence. Then when called on THAT, you started posting select evidence - just enough to shape the narrative you wanted; kind of like the edited J6 footage (and you can choose the Congressional edit or the Tucker edit - either way it is selectively edited to shape a narrative, not to show the truth.)
I stand by my assessments, and they will not change.
So PLEASE just drop it. Or at least go whine to someone else.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google