US: Angry White Men, Business Daily - BBC World Service

SSG Jessica Bautista - again your inability to comprehend that it isn't the podcast my comment was about is either intentionally being dishonest or an inability to comprehend Only you decide which .

You may have the last word continue to post your emotional responses vice reading and comprehending what I've written
It almost appears that you write a response before you actually read what was posted

And part of what makes it obvious you post with emotions in check the fax is your continued insistence that I haven't listened to the podcast know where in anything I've written states that or implies that I simply said when I posted that it was in reference to your use of the phrase and women and people of color I never said I didn't listen to the podcast I did I have an entire other thought on that

SSG Jessica Bautista - additionally I wasn't around for all of our nations history I've only been around for the last 52 years so I'll have to take it on your personal opinion but quite frankly it appears to many others myself included that that's just a victim chip on your shoulder

SGM Erik Marquez - so, if I am hearing you correctly, you are saying that you are offended in the way I presented the general demographics of the voter base that has been covered by multiple news sources?

Also, we are all the sum of our experiences. So I challenge you to find someone who DOESN'T have a chip on their shoulder. Take a look at yourself for being offended by such an innocuous statement.

I always enjoy your Input Ed no matter what it is!

The podcast was not the impetus for my response, not the subject of my comment.
It was simply a response to one person using the phrase "Angry white Men" a negitive, divisive phrase designed in its whole to elicit an emotional response, not entice reasonable viewers.
And a response to that of " women and people of color" an equally negitive and divisive set of words designed in its whole to elicit an emotional response, not entice reasonable discussion.