Posted on Aug 23, 2016
US election: Why is Clinton's foundation so controversial? - BBC News
2.99K
25
11
10
10
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 7
It was used to buy access including the time hillary was in the State Dept, period.
(3)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
"At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million."
http://tinyurl.com/jhn6r4b
http://tinyurl.com/jhn6r4b
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
I'm not the only one. Are you going to go on a downvote rampage? Never mind, since you can't be intellectually honest or provide constructive recourse, you'll never vote or make comments on my posts again. BTW frank, that was an AP story and they did the research you dismiss.
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/does-the-clinton-foundation-government-pay-to-play-scandal-concern-you
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/does-the-clinton-foundation-government-pay-to-play-scandal-concern-you
Does the Clinton Foundation Government Pay-to-Play scandal concern you? | RallyPoint
It concerns me. Giving special access to our government, to stars, athletes and governments for donations if Chicago style gangster ilk. If she is willing to do that for government access, what was to stop her from using our military as pay to play? Might it have already happened? https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state-183315225--election.html
(0)
(0)
If we had journalists we could trust and if we had a Dept of Justice we could trust there wouldn't be any issues. Either the Clintons would be exonerated or they'd be in jail. Sadly, we have neither and are left twisting in the wind.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next