8
8
0
A debate is a conversation, dispassionate, reasoned.
What Gun-Control/Gun-Rights Debate? - OpsLens
Posted from opslens.comPosted in these groups: 
Gun Control
Gun Control
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 2
7
7
0
Sir, all this writer did was fall for the Left's narrative guns are bad. Where is the town hall discussion on how government failed on all levels? School officials failed to properly report the shooters acts of indiscipline. The local Police failed us when the shooter was not arrested for making numerous death threats and holding a gun to the head of another kid. Where are the school counselors that spoke with the shooter? Where are their assessments? Where is the FBI agent that visited the shooters house? Same, where are the Police Officers that visited the shooters house 35 times? Why was no action taken? Why is the Left and Right falling for an incorrect narrative? Why are the people fighting amongst themselves while government gets a pass??
(7)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
I don't think you actually read the article, did you? It is a very pointed argument against the Left, exposing their mechanizations to direct the narrative in their favor.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
I read it. Still waiting for the townhall with the Dept of Education, FBI, School Counselors, local court officials, family and friends of the Shooter, those that were victims of the shooter. Where are the Police that visited his residence? Why was he not under a temporary restraining order after threatening a kid and putting a gun to his head? How did CNN organize their event so rapidly and yet we know nothing about the school reform act of 2014 and how Cruz was passed from school to school
without a paper trail. No Police file that was submitted to the FBI that made it to NICS? I got the article, I fail to see any action.
without a paper trail. No Police file that was submitted to the FBI that made it to NICS? I got the article, I fail to see any action.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
"The gun control Left accuses the gun rights Right of “having blood on their hands” because they don’t agree with the Left’s views on a political issue. This is ironic because the Right does not accuse the Left of wanting kids to die, even though the Left’s amorphous and ineffective “solutions” are more likely to result in tragedy."
I accuse the "gun control Left" of (at least) unwittingly causing school shootings, and at worst, the intent of sacrificing innocent lives to advance their agenda.
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders by making them criminals if they lawfully possesed a gun in a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco), but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that it is not recording areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school building.
http://sf-planning.org/areas-within-1000-feet-school
I accuse the "gun control Left" of (at least) unwittingly causing school shootings, and at worst, the intent of sacrificing innocent lives to advance their agenda.
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders by making them criminals if they lawfully possesed a gun in a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco), but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that it is not recording areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school building.
http://sf-planning.org/areas-within-1000-feet-school
Areas Within 1,000 feet of a San Francisco School | Planning Department
Areas highlighted on the map in blue are within 1,000ft of a San Francisco school. Last updated December 2015.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google