Posted on Jan 16, 2017
What do people who have actually been under fire think of the "Only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun" argument?
2.41K
63
20
6
6
0
Posted in these groups: 2nd Amendment Gun Control
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
"Only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun"
I don't know anyone that thinks that.
I do know many that think a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.
Subtle difference, but different it is.
Every month we read of a good guy with a gun that stopped a bad guy with a gun...so that is fact, not opinion.
But good guys with hands, knees, and feet have stopped a bad guy with a gun as well.
Good guy with a cell phone have stopped a bad guy with a gun..
ect ect ect
I don't know anyone that thinks that.
I do know many that think a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.
Subtle difference, but different it is.
Every month we read of a good guy with a gun that stopped a bad guy with a gun...so that is fact, not opinion.
But good guys with hands, knees, and feet have stopped a bad guy with a gun as well.
Good guy with a cell phone have stopped a bad guy with a gun..
ect ect ect
(11)
Comment
(0)
Suspended Profile
>1 y
good people need to be engaged, alert, oriented and ready to intervene on someones behalf. Even if it's not "their business".
A gun can help to embolden but a person that requires a gun for that may not act quickly enough.
A gun can help to embolden but a person that requires a gun for that may not act quickly enough.
SPC Johnney Abbott
>1 y
A bad guy with a gun isn't going to stop another bad guy with a gun.
Gun free zones create victim zones. Fact.
Gun free zones create victim zones. Fact.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT William Howell
>1 y
PO2 Robert M. That is one of the most important parts of a gun fight. Everything you do may be questioned by people that their and only experience is what they see on TV. A smaller caliber gun make take a bunch of bullets to stop the threat and a jury may not understand. I see it all the time with police shootings.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
>1 y
SGT William Howell, PO2 Robert M. - The two most important qualities in a gun for self-defense is availability and reliability. The .22 gun on your person is better than the .357 at home. A .22 doesn't have the same stopping power, no argument there, and it requires a little more care in aiming, but it can still be an effective crime-stopper
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT William Howell
>1 y
SSgt Christopher Brose - Agreed. My carry of choice is my .32 Tomcat because it fits right into my pocket. You still have to be ready for the question of why did you shoot a person 7 times. Especially if they are a minority.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
>1 y
That is exactly why I have insurance for that sort of question. If I ever have to use lethal force to defend myself, I have immediate legal help.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/
USCCA-Concealed Carry Self Defense Insurance & CCW Info - The United States Concealed Carry...
The United States Concealed Carry Association offers education, training & legal/financial protection for responsbile American gun owners. Learn more here.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
That is a fair statement of the situation. The question comes down to, do you need to call a good guy (the police) or do you happen to have one on site at the time of the incident. If the sane members of the public were to take more responsibility for their own personal safety, then the mass shooting incidents would trend towards being a lot less massive. This is all predicated on the political class not passing laws that disarm the victims.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Read This Next