Avatar feed
Responses: 6
MAJ Ken Landgren
2
2
0
Good thing it was a training round.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
>1 y
SGT Greg Strickland - What is your theory?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Greg Strickland
SGT Greg Strickland
>1 y
Less a theory and more just a note: it could have been intentional. As I said, I haven't been following it too closely, so I don't know if that's already been ruled out or not.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
>1 y
SGT Greg Strickland - Interesting.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Michael McMahon
SGT Michael McMahon
>1 y
With the problems in the III Corps, that is completely possible!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Self Employed
2
2
0
Correction, I saw the earlier story in a did not show the detail just showed pictures of the top of the turret. Oh my God, a main gun training around!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Self Employed
2
2
0
Good thing it wasn't the main gun. Still come a seeing blood on the turret is very disheartening. I hope the armor crew member makes a full recovery.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
What makes you think it wasn’t the main gun? I didn’t in see the article it specifying which gun system had been engaged. Considering the tanks were approximately 2600 m apart I’m gonna assume it was a training round from the main gun.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC Self Employed
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
MAJ James Woods I saw the earliest report and I thought you had the same report. Yes, it was a main gun practice round. This is horrible! The TC or the Gunner fired it. SMH
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close