Posted on Jul 12, 2015
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad
33.8K
848
330
107
107
0
6a6c01fe
A high-profile shooting, like the June 17 crime that left dead nine members of a historically black church in Charleston, South Carolina, is typically followed by calls for greater gun control, along with counter arguments that the best way to stop gun crimes is with more guns.

"The one thing that would have at least ameliorated the horrible situation in Charleston would have been that if somebody in that prayer meeting had a conceal carry or there had been either an off-duty policeman or an on-duty policeman, somebody with the legal authority to carry a firearm and could have stopped the shooter," presidential candidate Mike Huckabee said in a Fox News interview on June 19.

A new study, however, throws cold water on the idea that a well-armed populace deters criminals or prevents murders. Instead, higher ownership of guns in a state is linked to more firearm robberies, more firearm assaults and more homicide in general.

"We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime," said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Instead, we found the opposite."

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/guns-dont-deter-crime-study-finds/ar-AAcDdis
Posted in these groups: Original CrimeArticle319418 21 no violence2 ViolenceDd389bad Gun Control
Avatar feed
Responses: 141
LTC John Shaw
64
64
0
Edited 9 y ago
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad Let the balance of the studies begin! Can we focus on the criminal use of weapons and remove the stats that occur when lawful use by police and home owners for defense?
I am confident the left will roll out 'objective' study after study. Very soon they will vilify anyone who supports the 2nd Amendment rights as a gun violence 'denier' and tell you the science is settled. All the while pushing bias study after study into the MSM and media matters.

Why not put emphasis on development of non-lethals that can be used by citizens and police to protect themselves. Why not focus on criminal use of weapons?
(64)
Comment
(0)
SFC Robert Falco
SFC Robert Falco
6 mo
PO1 David Kingsley - Beto O'Rourke: 'Hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15'

YouTube
https://www.youtube.com › watch

1:54
Presidential hopeful Beto O'Rourke gives his vision for gun control at the Democratic debate. In passionate answer on gun violence,
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 David Kingsley
PO1 David Kingsley
6 mo
your link didn't carry through
Google is your friend
I found a clip where Beto O'Rourke was talking about taking guns from people. It appears that he had recently been as a government representative to a Mass Shooting incident. It seems that his biggest concern was that a standard size and form of ammunition for the AR-15 and the AK-47 is such that they are designed to produce incredible amounts of damage. it may have just the design of the ammunition, but that Combat Ammunition, shouldn't be available to Civilians in any form
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Scott Moreland
SGT Scott Moreland
5 mo
PO1 (Join to see) - The past 8 years have proven the LTC correct on every point. To correct your last statement - I know that I'll be safe: shopping, worshiping, clubbing, relaxing in a park, minding my own business, knocking on the wrong door, or just going to school BECAUSE of the right to carry everywhere to defend myself and others at any time.
(3)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Don Uhrig
PO1 Don Uhrig
16 d
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
61
61
0
I buy (on average) about two guns a year....I've had zero problems with crime or criminals approaching me or my family....I have no problem with more guns.
(61)
Comment
(0)
CPT Special Forces Officer
CPT (Join to see)
12 mo
SGM (Join to see) - Spray and pray has never been a particularly effective method of targeting the enemy. If that soldier you refer to existed, it is an indictment both of infantry training and the mental health services.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Scott Moreland
SGT Scott Moreland
5 mo
PV2 Larry Sellnow - Took 5 months digging up a near 30 year old article in the local library? Let's get back to the original post about more guns not adding up to less crime against your article. Arm everyone working in those banks and have them trained and ready. You walk into just about any bank, you're strolling into a kill pocket, surrounded on 3 sides. I don't care how good you've trained, there's going to be fatalities. You won't make it past the 2nd bank alive, guaranteed. If criminals have ill intent, trained or untrained, they're going to think twice because even the innocent looking church lady could turn out to be pure hell in a gunfight. Times that by being surrounded by at least 15 people or more in any given place and time of day, who are armed and trained well, I'd bet my lifetime earnings that crime goes down.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT John Schmelzkopf
SGT John Schmelzkopf
5 mo
I had 3 Combat Tours, 1st 1/503 went with Line Co's, 65-66, 2nd 135 AHC volunteered as Door Gunner, 70-71, then 3rd MACV, JMC, 72-73. With exception of 135th, the only times I went full Auto was test firing my Weapon before going to load out for Op's.
I'm 76 and can present from concealed under 3-4 seconds, have done AirSoft and Simunition under Gun with 75% or better survival and downed BG consistent.
Practice, Mindset, "Get off the X", Situation Awareness and practice hitting on the move.
Also my motto "Show me a Man that changes EDC or Holster like he changes his underwear and I'll show you a Man who'll be changing his underwear if he survives his first Gunfight"
Always subconscious, what if, avoid, move away and if possible when getting off X, try to move to have clear shot and try to not have innocents in return fire area. Remember you can't take a bullet that's left the barrel back, you also might be drawing fire. It's better to see Predators and avoid if possible and even if 100% justified it could cost you $20K or more
(0)
Reply
(0)
A1C Jj Birchard
A1C Jj Birchard
4 mo
But is your family safe from you, or you from them? There are sound reasons why cops always look at the family and friends first when someone is murdered.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Cryptologic Technician (Collection)
38
38
0
i believe there is still some data in this link that is a little miss leading. I pulled this from the article.
this study method proves that more guns are linked to more gun crime and overall homicide, but not that access to guns directly causes this criminal uptick, said study researcher David Hemenway, the director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center.

now I give the example if a robber comes into my house armed with a knife or a weapon other then a firearm and I shoot and kill him in self defense then that would count as a gun homicide would it not? so that fact that I used my weapon in self defense would then be added to the statistic saying that owning a gun leads to more gun crime and gun homicide.
(38)
Comment
(0)
SPC Paul Eiden
SPC Paul Eiden
5 mo
It seems that every mass shooting provides a political out cry for the removal of guns. Backed by the political media hype of the shooting as a call for more gun control rather than what was the cause or reason. In most cases it was mental illness that never was addressed. Killings are going to happen whether it is a gun, knife, hammer or a rock as proved with history going back to Cain and Able. Gun control does nothing to prevent or stop criminals but puts extra burden on legal gun owners. PERIOD!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
CAPT Kevin M. McGuinness
CAPT Kevin M. McGuinness
5 mo
That makes sense.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CAPT Kevin M. McGuinness
CAPT Kevin M. McGuinness
5 mo
SSgt Paul Esquibel Maybe we’ll try Prohibition again since that was so successful last time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM Thomas Ray
CSM Thomas Ray
3 mo
Not only that but suicide is considered a homicide as well and counts in the total of gun deaths
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close