Posted on Sep 3, 2021
Election Ballot Recount Shock and Anger Arizona Senate
597
16
6
4
4
0
Over 74000 ballots appeared out of thin air. Most for Joe Biden. This is only part of the thousands of questionable ballots found in the recount.
If you do not understand the massive difference between recount, audit and forensic audit - well - shame on you.
If you do not understand the massive difference between recount, audit and forensic audit - well - shame on you.
Election Ballot Recount Shock and Anger Arizona Senate
Posted from bitchute.com
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
Posted >1 y ago
A sucker is born every minute.
But sure, just keep uncritically sucking in what you want to hear without doing even a bit of research.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/07/fact-check-there-were-not-over-74000-more-mail-in-ballots.html
This is how they work, from the horse's mouth.
https://twitter.com/maricopacounty/status/ [login to see] 26313216?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E [login to see] 26313216%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fleadstories.com%2Fhoax-alert%2F2021%2F07%2Ffact-check-there-were-not-over-74000-more-mail-in-ballots.html
But sure, just keep uncritically sucking in what you want to hear without doing even a bit of research.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/07/fact-check-there-were-not-over-74000-more-mail-in-ballots.html
This is how they work, from the horse's mouth.
https://twitter.com/maricopacounty/status/ [login to see] 26313216?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E [login to see] 26313216%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fleadstories.com%2Fhoax-alert%2F2021%2F07%2Ffact-check-there-were-not-over-74000-more-mail-in-ballots.html
Fact Check: There Were NOT 'Over 74,000' More Mail-In Ballots Received, Counted In Maricopa...
Were over 74,000 more mail-in ballots received and counted than were mailed out for the 2020 election in Maricopa County,...
(4)
Comment
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
Just curious as to if this election was fraudulent then how come democrats didn't take all offices.
And if it is does that mean the Republicans that won their election actually lost it.
And if it is does that mean the Republicans that won their election actually lost it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
Let me caveat that I do not believe that Trump won the election. Biden is the President. Period.
BUT...
If there *had* been the level of fraud that is being discussed, a *smart* fraudster would target their fraud. They didn't need Joe to win EVERY state - just *enough* states. Likewise, Dems don't need to win EVERY seat in Congress - just *enough* seats. They have a majority in the House, the President (and VP) and a tie in the Senate - with that VP seat casting the tie-breaking vote. Doing it this way gives your party an absolute majority (although I am sure they would have preferred 60 in the Senate to be filibuster-proof), but maintains the VENEER of "free and fair elections."
If there *had been* (and I do not believe there was) significant and extensive fraud to elect Joe Biden, this is EXACTLY the kind of result you would hope for.
TL:DR version: Your argument is silly and without merit.
BUT...
If there *had* been the level of fraud that is being discussed, a *smart* fraudster would target their fraud. They didn't need Joe to win EVERY state - just *enough* states. Likewise, Dems don't need to win EVERY seat in Congress - just *enough* seats. They have a majority in the House, the President (and VP) and a tie in the Senate - with that VP seat casting the tie-breaking vote. Doing it this way gives your party an absolute majority (although I am sure they would have preferred 60 in the Senate to be filibuster-proof), but maintains the VENEER of "free and fair elections."
If there *had been* (and I do not believe there was) significant and extensive fraud to elect Joe Biden, this is EXACTLY the kind of result you would hope for.
TL:DR version: Your argument is silly and without merit.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
Thank you brother for this interesting piece of news brother SSgt (Join to see)
(2)
Comment
(0)
Read This Next