Avatar_feed
Responses: 3
MSgt Dave Hoffman
3
3
0
You know, the odd thing about this commentary is the fact that Napolitano doesn't mention the fact that no witnesses were allowed to be called in the House to refute Democrat "witnesses", nor does he mention the numerous times that Republicans were called "out of order" when trying to present facts. Why does everyone ignore this?
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar_small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
Capt Dwayne Conyers Can't be Telling the Truth at Fox. Everybody saw what happened to Shep Smith, Not Sure How Long Chris Wallace will Survive
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar_small
Cpl Jeff N.
1
1
0
Unfortunately for Napolitano his legal musings are missing core facts. There are 4 facts that have not changed. Congressman Jordan has repeated this since the impeachment sham in the house.

1. President Trump and President Zelensky both say there was no pressure.
So the person that supposedly was pressured and had a QPQ levied on him believed no such thing had occurred.
2. The transcript shows no conditionality
There were no conditions discussed for Zelensky to follow or else.
3. Ukraine didn’t know aid was held back at time of the call
The president (any president) can hold back aid and they do all of the time. Zelesnky was new and supposedly a reformer in one of the most corrupt countries in the region. Trump wanted to ensure he was the real deal, a reformer.
4. Ukraine never took any of the actions they were supposedly being pressured to take.
The aid was released, no investigations took place to get it and no other actions were required of Ukraine to receive the aid. It was released before it was legally required and there was no "gap" in the lethal aid they were receiving from the Trump administration. The lethal aid The Obama administration would not give Ukraine even though they asked for it repeatedly.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar_small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close