Posted on Mar 3, 2017
LTC Stephen F.
7.35K
86
20
11
11
0
Today I got blood-test results from my most recent VA appointment. Some were high and one was low. I have been tracking my results for a few years. Many of the blood tests have different acceptable ranges for men and women. That got me wondering about the potential impact for those who went through gender reassignment surgery and are now transgender
Posted in these groups: Ems Medical9ed82c1 TransgenderChecklist icon 2 Standards
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 12
SSgt Robert Marx
8
8
0
I would think that so called reassignment surgery would have an overall negative impact upon one's health and would probably cause or exasperate psychological issues.
(8)
Comment
(0)
SFC Intelligence Analyst
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Perhaps you should do more research on the topic...
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Lisa Fields
6
6
0
For transitioning soldiers the range of the new gender is used to monitor their development and health. It's what is often referd to as "being stable" once an individuals hormone and other blood test fall into the range of their new gender for a set peiord of time they are considered stable.

Once this happens life risk factors for are what the doctors look for cancers, bone density changes etc.
(6)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
Thank you for responding SGT Lisa Fields and making us aware of the current standards.
FYI 1LT Sandy Annala CPT (Join to see) LTC Paul Labrador CPT Barbara Smith MSgt Ronald Stacy BG (Join to see) COL Mikel J. Burroughs SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SSG Leo Bell SSgt (Join to see) Kim Bolen RN CCM ACM Capt Seid Waddell Capt Tom Brown SMSgt Minister Gerald A. Thomas SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4"SSgt Robert Marx TSgt Joe C. SP5 Mark Kuzinski SGT Robert George
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Commander
5
5
0
How will this impact scientific and medical studies in the future? I get gender and sex is separate in today’s world but in order to do true studies, we can factor in what gender someone identifies as in order to fully provide sound physiology medical treatment. Or do we need to expand testing to include the 54+ gender identifies into standard medical studies which could slowdown medics advances proportionally. #unintendedcostand consequences
(5)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
Thank you for responding Lt Col (Join to see) and stating an articulate position.
1. There are two genders by definition which make sense for reproduction genital appearance.
2. Sexual preferences was once indicative of psychological states from normal range to aberrant behavior :-) The Psychological associations changed their definitions over the past couple decades [That reminds me of Pluto being "downgraded" to no longer being a planet :-) ]
3. Sexual behavior has varying degrees of risk associated across the myriad possibilities :-) The blood tests which make sense to me are those focused on identifying communicable diseases and conditions as quickly as possible to reduce chances of epidemics.
What do you think?
COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Orlando Illi Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Maj William W. 'Bill' Price CPT Jack Durish Capt Tom Brown CMSgt (Join to see) MSG Andrew White SFC William Farrell SGT (Join to see) Sgt Albert Castro SSG David Andrews Sgt Randy Wilber Sgt John H. SGT Charles H. Hawes SGT Mark Halmrast PO1 William "Chip" Nagel CPT Gabe SnellLTC Greg Henning
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close