Posted on Jul 19, 2021
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
4.1K
339
226
13
13
0
Socialism is antithetical to the US Constitution... as is illegal immigration and other issues we find in today's Washington news. In the Oath of Office, it states, and more, "I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same...".

Should Officers in the US Military, Congressional Members, OR those in the Executive Branch of our Government resign from their positions if they accede to the ideals of Communism or Socialism? Should they be relieved of command? AND... as we seen in the current Admin in Washington, do WE, the PEOPLE have recourse to remove those that are clear Socialists and Communists? In the USA, you DO have freedom of speech... but when you take an Oath of Office and openly betray that Oath, what are WE as Citizens to do?
Avatar feed
Responses: 32
CPT Jack Durish
15
15
0
It seems that most oaths are symbolic. You cannot be prosecuted for violating your oath of office, but can be prosecuted for lying under oath. The only penalty, it seems, for violating an oath of office is failure to be reelected. (Forgive me while I fall to the floor laughing. How many have suffered that fate?)
(15)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
>1 y
1SG Dennis Hicks - GDP growth of 9% in Q2 with overall 6% GDP growth annually. Better numbers than Trump ever put up. You idiots are just lucky stupidity isn't painful.

https://www.economy.com/united-states/indicators
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
>1 y
SGT Nickolas Ortiz - Evidence? Show me the elected officials who have ever been prosecuted for failure to honor their oaths of office. C'mon. Then you can toss insults around like a monkey throws shit
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
>1 y
CPT Jack Durish - thanks for playing Capt Obvious. You should really read the initial thread before you come on and show the world you're not educated and a total moron.

Lean to read.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
>1 y
MSgt Steve Sweeney - no, seriously... you ACTUALLY believe that's an accomplishment? The majority of the US was shut down... these aren't "new" jobs, they're the jobs shut down due to the pandemic. You just applauded the arsonist for building a smaller home back that he just burnt down! You're a MSGT???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... I don't believe so.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA John Monette
11
11
0
if you want an elected official removed, go vote
(11)
Comment
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi - The source in this case is Alex Griswold of Mediaite
https://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-wont-stop-joking-about-banging-his-daughter/
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
The Examiner is National Enquirer level of inaccurate. it's a shit source. Got a better one?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
The source cited mentioned intent, not accomplishment of deed.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi - I also call the Huffpost a shit source. I demand accuracy and verification. Has nothing to do with it confirming a political bias.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Psychological Operations Specialist
8
8
0
Most of what is tossed out in the news is grossly incorrect about socialism, communism and even capitalism. Im not here to get into a debate about the finer points of any of those, but as a member of the US Military dont get drawn into catch phrases and political drama. Our enemies actively create fictional problems for us to fight each other over.
(8)
Comment
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
SGT Nickolas Ortiz - "There is no room for not paying attention to "catch phrases and political drama"... you must be informed with what is going on." Catch phrases are unfortunately a short circuit that needs to be fixed by citing sources and getting specific. The spirit of what you are saying I agree with, but I believe you are factually incorrect in the content for the events you are talking about.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
SGT Nickolas Ortiz
>1 y
SPC Paul Shene III - " but I believe you are factually incorrect in the content for the events you are talking about..." OK... defend your point. "Catch phrases" are the starting point of a topic... it's up to the individual to deduce it's validity, not the Media, not the Government...
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Paul Shene III
SPC Paul Shene III
>1 y
SGT Nickolas Ortiz - now you are attempting to shift the burden of proof. I made no claim, I simply disbelieved your claim. You have the burden of proof, meaning cite sources, put forth evidence.
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Steven Guess
PO3 Steven Guess
>1 y
Sorry, not buying any of that
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close