Avatar_feed
Responses: 20
Lt Col Charlie Brown
11
11
0
I agree with PO3 Bob McCord These sites have been in our sights for a while...
(11)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Bob McCord
PO3 Bob McCord
9 mo
Oh yeah they had to have been. But not by Obama.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
Lt Col Charlie Brown
9 mo
PO3 Bob McCord - of course not, unless it was for a money drop.
(3)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar_small
PO3 Bob McCord
10
10
0
If this true you can bet those 52 sites have been targeted for a long time and all of the intel to hit them fast is already in the system. All set for a "go".
(10)
Comment
(0)
SFC Combat Engineer
SFC (Join to see)
9 mo
Don’t you just love the media, it sounds like they want to be Iran’s lawyer.
(3)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Bob McCord
PO3 Bob McCord
9 mo
SFC (Join to see) - Yeah you would think the Democrats had Obama back. Siding with terrorists. That's how much they hate! and I mean really hate! President Trump and those of us that voted for him. They would rather support terrorists that attack the U.S. than support our elected President and the country they are citizens of. Sick, sick, and yet they preach against hate. Sick, sick, sick hypocrites.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar_small
CPT Jack Durish
9
9
0
Even that is way to much information. It would allow the enemy to count targets as they are attacked, helping them to perceive a pattern that might help them better defend remaining targets.
(9)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
9 mo
CPT Jack Durish too cocky and too much info. The element of surprise had been compromised
(2)
Reply
(0)
GySgt Team Chief
GySgt (Join to see)
9 mo
Or it could be misinformation.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
9 mo
Maybe. But I still like the symbolism.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar_small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close