Let me get this straight. You support the right of a business to choose not to sell cake to gays because it is against their morals, but you are against the rights of a business to not sell an app because is is contrary to their morals. Did I get that right?

I support the right of each business to be able to determine what they will purchase, trade, manufacture, and sell SPC John Smith Special modifications to merchandise or food should not violate the convictions of the purveyors.
The issue with Parler.com which was a competitor to Twitter, Tik Tok, etc is more of an antitrust issue. Up until now section 230 of FCC regulations has shielded the social media startups through mega-organizations from much. I am hopeful that antitrust law will be applied to Twitter, Google and Apple since they are publicly traded and not private companies.

I would expect you would like to have a network where you could post support for gay couples wanting to purchase, etc without being blasted by trolls an nauseum.

Do you agree? Lt Col Charlie Brown SPC(P) (Join to see) Maj Marty Hogan LTC John Griscom SPC Mark Huddleston PVT Mark Zehner Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt (Join to see) SPC Nancy Greene

SPC John Smith i think what he is getting at is that refusing a product is NOT preventing free speech, but censoring ones thoughts and ideas is, which is against the first amendment.